Action-Monitoring Dysfunction in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

By William J. Gehring, J. Himle, L. Nisenson. Psychology Science, 2000

676 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1f79c4b8aa8bd00235fd9ab41af77bee510cd1a0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review. (2007, methodology): “However, the overall results clearly differ from the standard FRN result of larger amplitudes for losses, as the stimuli signaling absolute losses (XXX in the loss block) did not elicit a larger negativity than those signaling absolute gains (XXX in the gain block), and indeed there was a slight tre”
Dysfunctional action monitoring hyperactivates frontal-striatal circuits in obsessive-compulsive disorder: an event-related fMRI study (2005, positive): “While the bulk of research data localizes the action-monitoring function to caudal ACC among healthy controls (e.g., Botvinick et al., 1999; Carter et al., 1998, 2000; Gehring et al., 2000), rostral ACC has also been shown to activate during errors of commission (Kiehl et al.”
Bridging emotion theory and neurobiology through dynamic systems modeling (2005, methodology): “Conversely, obsessive-compulsive individuals show higher-amplitude ERNs than normal individuals (Gehring et al. 2000).”
Neurobiology of emotion perception I: The neural basis of normal emotion perception. (2003, background): “Interestingly, error-related negativity has been reported to be higher in patients with anxiety disorders (Gehring et al 2000), and cingulotomy, involving lesions to dorsal regions, has been demonstrated to be a successful treatment for these patients (Cosgrove and Rauch 1995).”
Prefrontal–cingulate interactions in action monitoring (2000, background): “Also consistent with this evidence, the ERN is enhanced in individuals with obsessive-compulsive disorde”
The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. (2002, background): “Furthermore, the ERN is abnormal both in individuals with obsessive–compulsive disorder (Gehring et al., 2000) and in individuals with dorsolateral prefrontal damage (Gehring & Knight, 2000), conditions that are associated with executive dysfunction.”
Obsessional Beliefs and Symptoms of Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder in a Clinical Sample (2008, background): “Affective, cognitive, and physiological reactions associated with these experiences remain unclear; however, one theory proposed by Pitman (1987) and further explored in neuroimaging research (Fitzgerald et al. 2005; Gehring et al. 2000; Maltby et al. 2005; Ursu et al. 2003) is that hyperactive er”
The anterior cingulate as a conflict monitor: fMRI and ERP studies. (2002, background): “An increased ERN has been reported in this illness, which has been interpreted as an overactive error monitoring system [42].”
The Timing of Action-Monitoring Processes in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex (2002, methodology): “The ERN has repeatedly been modeled by a single dipole source, located in the vicinity of the ACC ( Gehring, Himle, & Nisenson, 2000; Holroyd, Dien, & Coles, 1998; Dehaene, 1996; Dehaene, Posner, & Tucker, 1994).”
On the ERN and the significance of errors. (2005, neutral): “For instance, a number of studies have reported enhanced ERNs in affectively distressed subjects (Gehring et al., 2000; Hajcak& Simons, 2002; Hajcak et al., 2003; Hajcak,McDonald, et al., 2004, Johannes, Wieringa, Nager, Rada, et al., 2001; Luu, Collins et al., 2000).”
Neural mechanisms involved in error processing: A comparison of errors made with and without awareness (2005, background): “…cognitive control is implemented, but also because understanding its cortical network may offer insights into the dysfunctions of self-monitoring seen in a range of clinical conditions (Carter et al., 2001; Forman et al., 2004; Gehring et al., 2000; Kaufman et al., 2003; Mathalon et al., 2003).”