Prefrontal–cingulate interactions in action monitoring
By William J. Gehring, Robert T. Knight. Nature Neuroscience, 2000
895 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b32141e33ac58999f93822038ed918679965d553
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Matthew Botvinick
- Michael J Frank
- J. Cohen
- Michael P. Milham
- Markus Ullsperger
- Nora D. Volkow
- F. X. Castellanos
- Cameron S. Carter
In Social Psychology
- Matthew Botvinick
- Michael Inzlicht
- J. Cohen
- R. Hester
- Sander Nieuwenhuis
- Russell A. Poldrack
- Jared M. Novick
- F. X. Castellanos
Citations in the corpus
- The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. (2002, background): “Furthermore, the ERN is abnormal both in individuals with obsessive–compulsive disorder (Gehring et al., 2000) and in individuals with dorsolateral prefrontal damage (Gehring & Knight, 2000), conditions that are associated with executive dysfunction.”
- Mapping the functional connectivity of anterior cingulate cortex (2007, background): “…to ACC, such as conflict monitoring (Botvinick et al., 2004; Carter et al., 1998), error monitoring and detection (Gehring and Fencsik, 2001; Gehring and Knight, 2000; Holroyd et al., 1998; Lorist et al., 2005), response selection (Awh and Gehring, 1999; Milham et al., 2001; Paus, 2001;…”
- Where and When the Anterior Cingulate Cortex Modulates Attentional Response: Combined fMRI and ERP Evidence (2006, neutral): “…role in attentional control (Botvinick, Braver, Barch, Carter, & Cohen, 2001; Milham, Banich, Webb, et al., 2001; Paus, 2001; Bush, Luu, & Posner, 2000; Davis, Hutchison, Lozano, Tasker, & Dostrovsky, 2000; Gehring & Knight, 2000; Carter, Botvinick, & Cohen, 1999; Devinsky, Morrell, & Vogt, 1995).”
- A midline dissociation between error-processing and response-conflict monitoring (2003, background): “The importance of these monitoring processes, coupled with evidence of their altered function in several clinical groups ( Gehring and Knight, 2000; Carter et al., 2001; Alain et al., 2002), has increased interest in identifying their neuroanatomical bases.”
- Aging and the Neural Correlates of Successful Picture Encoding: Frontal Activations Compensate for Decreased Medial-Temporal Activity (2005, neutral): “Older adults made somewhat more false alarms than younger adults [t(25) = 2.47, p .03], which led to an advantage for younger adults on A0 scores, as they are calculated using hit rates and false alarm rates [t(25) = 2.83, p < .01].”
- Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review. (2007, background): “…damage to medial prefrontal cortex, including a patient with a focal ACC lesion, have been observed to have attenuated ERNs (Stemmer, Segalowitz, Witzke, & Schönle, 2004; Swick & Turken, 2002; see also Gehring & Knight, 2000; Ullsperger & von Cramon, 2006; Ullsperger, von Cramon, & Müller, 2002).”
- Anterior cingulate activity during error and autonomic response (2005, background): “…cortical regions can impair the specificity of midline ERPs to error trials, while incidentally not impairing attentional switching, adds further evidence for the importance of lateral prefrontal cortex, and perhaps an incidental role of ACC, in cognitive control (Gehring and Knight, 2000, 2002).”
- Principal components analysis of Laplacian waveforms as a generic method for identifying ERP generator patterns: I. Evaluation with auditory oddball tasks. (2006, background): “In healthy adults, the ERN may also be found during correct trials (Gehring and Knight, 2000; Vidal et al., 2000).”
- Mental fatigue, motivation and action monitoring. (2006, methodology): “In addition to reflecting action monitoring, the Ne/ERN also serves to signal the need to initiate performance adjustments after errors (Gehring and Knight, 2000).”
- A Cognitive Control Perspective of Self-Control Strength and Its Depletion (2010, background): “For example, high levels of ACC activity have been observed among individuals (such as those suffering from obsessive-compulsive disorder) who nonetheless exhibit difficulties overriding unwanted behaviors (Gehring & Knight, 2000).”
- Organisation of executive functions: Hemispheric asymmetries (2012, background): “…(i.e., no ERN difference between these two conditions) or implement online behavioural adjustments according to experienced conflict if lateral PFC is damaged (Gehring & Knight, 2000), suggesting that the latter critically modulates the functionality of ACC (Morishima, Okuda, & Sakai, 2010).”
- Neural mechanisms involved in error processing: A comparison of errors made with and without awareness (2005, background): “…cognitive control is implemented, but also because understanding its cortical network may offer insights into the dysfunctions of self-monitoring seen in a range of clinical conditions (Carter et al., 2001; Forman et al., 2004; Gehring et al., 2000; Kaufman et al., 2003; Mathalon et al., 2003).”
- Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update. (2004, result): “Although the same relationship between ACC activation and post-error slowing has been observed elsewhere [26,31], this must be reconciled with other studies, where apparent dissociations between the ERN and post-error behavior have been reported [64, 65 ].”
- Mental fatigue: costs and benefits. (2008, background): “Indeed, motivation appears to be essential for observing a robust ERN/Ne (Gehring et al., 1993; Gehring and Knight, 2000) and Bush et al. (2000) argued that ERN/Ne and related ACC activity represent a general evaluative system that processes the motivational significance of events.”