Energy conservation through product-integrated feedback: The roles of goal-setting and social orientation

By Lt Lorna McCalley, C. Midden. 2002

397 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Marketing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1f580bcd7f3ff9c58ac4e447628fa6a45d28a356

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

In Marketing

Citations in the corpus

Internal and external barriers to energy efficiency: which role for policy interventions? (2019, background): “Goal setting proves to be effective in particular in combination with tailored feedback (McCalley and Midden 2002; Abrahamse et al. 2007).”
The design of eco-feedback technology (2010, background): “Only one of the environmental psychology studies was a controlled lab study [40], but it offers a contrast to the HCI literature because it included a much larger sample size (N=100) and tested several different feedback conditions on behavior.”
Making the implicit explicit: A look inside the implicit discount rate (2016, background): “Nudging policies generally include feedback, goal setting, normative messages or default setting (e.g. Croson and Treich, 2014; Abrahamese et al., 2005, 2009; McCalley and Midden, 2002; Schultz et al., 2007).”
Persuasive Trash Cans (2008, background): “…technologies are presently recognized as particularly suited to the task of persuasion (e.g., IJsselsteijn, de Kort, Midden, Eggen, & van den Hoven 2006; McCalley & Midden, 2002), noninteractive environments and objects (through their physical form) also influence the way we think and act.”
Information Strategies and Energy Conservation Behavior: A Meta-analysis of Experimental Studies from 1975-2012 - eScholarship (2013, positive): “At the same time, research on the influence of non-price strategies such as peer comparisons (Katzev and Johnson, 1983; McCalley and Midden, 2002; Schultz et al., 2007; Stern, 1992) has highlighted approaches beyond price information that may drive conservation behavior.”
Information Strategies and Energy Conservation Behavior: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Studies from 1975 to 2012 (2013, positive): “At the same time, research on the in ﬂ uence of non-price strategies such as peer comparisons (Katzev and Johnson, 1983; McCalley and Midden, 2002; Schultz et al., 2007; Stern, 1992) has high-lighted approaches beyond price information that may drive conservation behavior.”
Factors influencing energy-saving behavior of urban households in Jiangsu Province (2013, background): “…by a combination of interventions, including tailored information, individual goal-setting, and personalized feedback to help people to think more holistically about the personal, social, and technological dimensions of energy conservation (Abrahamse et al., 2007; McCalley and Midden, 2002).”
Feedback on household electricity consumption: a tool for saving energy? (2008, background): “One is a laboratory study ( McCalley and Midden 2002 ) .”
Behaviour Theory and Soft Transport Policy Measures (2011, background): “However, the positive effect of difficult goals depends on that people accept the challenge and have sufficient experience, possess self-efficacy and obtain adequate feedback (e.g. McCalley and Midden, 2002).”
One size does not fit all: applying the transtheoretical model to energy feedback technology design (2010, background): “Unless the energy consumer already holds a strong goal to use energy sustainably [36], feedback only informs, but does not necessarily motivate sustainable energy action.”