When Does Semantic Similarity Help Episodic Retrieval
By Marc W Howard, Michael J. Kahana. 2002
267 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1f411e1f6621ffabdbaec5989915101ee91b639b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Michael E. Hasselmo
- Marc W Howard
- Michael J. Kahana
- Aditya V Datey
- Mrigankka S Fotedar
- Aaron S. Benjamin
- Franklin Zaromb
- Yevgeniy B. Sirotin
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Michael E. Hasselmo
- Marc W Howard
- Michael J. Kahana
- Aditya V Datey
- Mrigankka S Fotedar
- Franklin Zaromb
- Arthur Wingfield
- Yevgeniy B. Sirotin
Citations in the corpus
- The New C Standard (Excerpted material) An Economic and Cultural Commentary (2008, unknown): “Studies by Howard and Kahana[7, 8 ] investigated the probability of a particular word on a list being recalled when subjects were given the name of another word.”
- Memory is More than just Remembering: Strategic Control of Encoding, Accessing Memory, and Making Decisions (2007, background): “Analyses of output order have shown that preexisting semantic relationships guide the order with which items are recalled (Howard & Kahana, 2002; Rundus, 1971; Tulving, 1972).”
- Structure and flexibility: Investigating the relation between the structure of the mental lexicon, fluid intelligence, and creative achievement. (2016, unknown): “LSA has been empirically applied to examine semantic priming, memory, and creativity (Chwilla & Kolk, 2002; Coane & Balota, 2011; Griffiths, Steyvers, & Firl, 2007; Howard & Kahana, 2002; L. L. Jones & Golonka, 2012; Prabhakaran, Green, & Gray, 2014; Steyvers, Shiffrin, & Nelson, 2004).”
- Temporal associations and prior-list intrusions in free recall. (2006, methodology): “Recently published models of free recall, including the temporal-context model (Howard, Fotedar, Datey, & Hasselmo, 2005; Howard & Kahana, 2002a) and the context-activation model (Davelaar, Goshen-Gottstein, Ashkenazi, Haarmann, & Usher, 2005) have neglected to include such a mechanism.”
- Language comprehension is both embodied and symbolic (2008, background): “At the same time, the majority of symbolism publications is computational in nature, showing how data are related to corpus linguistic findings (Burgess 1998; Howard and Kahanna 2002, Kintsch 1998a,b; Landauer 2002; Landauer and Dumais 1997; Lund and Burgess 1996; Steyvers et al. 2004).”
- How Team Composition and Collaborative Planning Jointly Shape Analytic Effectiveness (2008, methodology): “We used these words to create two 25-item lists of pairs, and also used latent semantic analysis matrices to minimize the semantic relatedness of cues and targets in each list ( Howard & Kahana, 2002 ).”
- A context maintenance and retrieval model of organizational processes in free recall (2009, unknown): “…Here, is a scaling parameter that determines how much new information (cIN) is placed in context, and i weakens the current state of context (ci 1) such that the overall level of contextual activation remains constant (for details concerning the form of this expression, see Howard & Kahana, 2002a).”
- Spacing and lag effects in free recall of pure lists (2005, background): “Howard & Kahana, 2002b; Pollio, Richards, & Lucas, 1969; Romney, Brewer, & Batchelder, 1993), or of an item studied in a nearby list position (Kahana, 1996).”
- The temporal context model in spatial navigation and relational learning: toward a common explanation of medial temporal lobe function across domains. (2005, methodology): “…change in the shape or magnitude of the CRP functions used to describe associations in free recall with inter-item distractor intervals up to 16 s. Howard and Kahana (2002a) showed that TCM predicts the persistence of both contiguity and asymmetry as the length of the inter-item distractor…”