On the persistence of private speech: Empirical and theoretical considerations.

By R. Duncan, D. Tarulli. 2009

18 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Language and Linguistics, Natural Language Processing, Cognitive Science & Psychology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. Ben Alderson-Day
2. E. Meins
3. Charles Fernyhough
4. J. Lidstone

In Language and Linguistics

1. E. Meins
2. J. Lidstone
3. Charles Fernyhough
4. Ben Alderson-Day
5. Christopher Jarrold
6. David M Williams
7. D. Bowler

In Natural Language Processing

1. Ben Alderson-Day
2. J. Lidstone
3. Charles Fernyhough
4. E. Meins

In Cognitive Science & Psychology

1. Ben Alderson-Day
2. Charles Fernyhough
3. E. Meins
4. J. Lidstone
5. Christopher Jarrold
6. David M Williams
7. D. Bowler
8. Simon McCarthy-Jones

Citations in the corpus

• Inner Speech: Development, Cognitive Functions, Phenomenology, and Neurobiology (2015, background): “However, there is also evidence for continuing high levels of private speech use well into the elementary school years (Berk & Garvin, 1984; Berk & Potts, 1991) and indeed into adulthood (Duncan & Cheyne, 2001; Duncan & Tarulli, 2009).”
• Individual differences in children's private speech: Consistency across tasks, timepoints, and contexts (2011, background): “The fact that PS was more overt in the classroom speaks against the idea that the main factor driving internalization is the transition to school (Duncan & Tarulli, 2009).”
• Verbal mediation of cognition in children with specific language impairment (2012, background): “Other authors cite social pressure not to speak to oneself as the major cause of internalization (Duncan & Tarulli, 2009), something children with SLI might experience to a lesser degree than typically developing children.”