Aquaculture: The Ecological Issues

By J. Davenport, K. Black, G. Burnell, T. Cross, S. Culloty, S. Ekaratne, B. Furness, M. Mulcahy, H. Thetmeyer. 2003

84 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Review of recent carrying capacity models for bivalve culture and recommendations for research and management (2006, background): “Aquaculture sites may function in a manner analogous to these structures (Costa-Pierce and Bridger, 2002; Olin, 2002; Davenport et al., 2003).”
Optimised effluent treatment by stabilised trout faeces (2005, background): “Although such methods have proven very effective in terms of waste reduction (Bergheim and Brinker, 2003; Davenport et al., 2003), their potential for further improvement is now rather low, due to physical, biological and economic constraints.”
Influence of suspended and off-bottom mussel culture on the sea bottom and benthic habitats: a review. (2011, background): “This increased production has raised concerns about the impacts of the activity on local environments (e.g., Black 2001) and there has been much work towards understanding the role of aquaculture in the ecosystem (e.g., Davenport et al. 2003; Holmer et al. 2008).”
Attraction and repulsion of mobile wild organisms to finfish and shellfish aquaculture: a review (2018, background): “Mussels grown in suspended culture have traits (i.e. high meat content and thin shells) that make them particularly appealing to diving ducks (Dunthorn 1971, Davenport et al. 2003, Kirk et al. 2007).”