Phylogenetic Placement of Exact Amplicon Sequences Improves Associations with Clinical Information

By Stefan Janssen, Daniel McDonald, Antonio Gonzalez, Jose A Navas-Molina, Lingjing Jiang, Zhenjiang Xu, K. Winker, D. Kado, E. Orwoll, M. Manary and 2 more. mSystems, 2018

447 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The move from OTU-based to sOTU-based analysis, while providing additional resolution, also introduces computational challenges. We demonstrate that one popular method of dealing with sOTUs (building a de novo tree from the short sequences) can provide incorrect results in human gut metagenomic studies and show that phylogenetic placement of the new sequences with SEPP resolves this problem while also yielding other benefits over existing methods. ABSTRACT Recent algorithmic advances in amplicon-based microbiome studies enable the inference of exact amplicon sequence fragments. These new methods enable the investigation of sub-operational taxonomic units (sOTU) by removing erroneous sequences. However, short (e.g., 150-nucleotide [nt]) DNA sequence fragments do not contain sufficient phylogenetic signal to reproduce a reasonable tree, introducing a barrier in the utilization of critical phylogenetically aware metrics such as Faith’s PD or UniFrac. Although fragment insertion methods do exist, those methods have not been tested for sOTUs from high-throughput amplicon studies in insertions against a broad reference phylogeny. We benchmarked the SATé-enabled phylogenetic placement (SEPP) technique explicitly against 16S V4 sequence fragments and showed that it outperforms the conceptually problematic but often-used practice of reconstructing de novo phylogenies. In addition, we provide a BSD-licensed QIIME2 plugin (https://github.com/biocore/q2-fragment-insertion) for SEPP and integration into the microbial study management platform QIITA. IMPORTANCE The move from OTU-based to sOTU-based analysis, while providing additional resolution, also introduces computational challenges. We demonstrate that one popular method of dealing with sOTUs (building a de novo tree from the short sequences) can provide incorrect results in human gut metagenomic studies and show that phylogenetic placement of the new sequences with SEPP resolves this problem while also yielding other benefits over existing methods.

Subfields: Genetics, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1e34bdec9f2963ce4b663a3d3945476b3b7047c8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

  1. Rob Knight
  2. J. Gregory Caporaso
  3. Antonio Gonzalez
  4. Daniel McDonald
  5. T. Kościółek
  6. Nicholas A. Bokulich

In Molecular Biology

  1. Rob Knight
  2. J. Gregory Caporaso
  3. Antonio Gonzalez
  4. Nicholas A. Bokulich
  5. Yoshiki Vazquez-Baeza
  6. Daniel McDonald
  7. Amanda Birmingham
  8. Cameron Martino

Citations in the corpus