The future of production systems in a globalized world

By E. Bennett, P. Balvanera. 2007

208 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1d04c2c38b050a0a783271ecba071e13df917a2f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

Are Socioeconomic Benefits of Restoration Adequately Quantified? A Meta‐analysis of Recent Papers (2000–2008) in Restoration Ecology and 12 Other Scientific Journals (2010, background): “Other tangible benefits are numerous, as reflected in the growing prospects for developing effective marketplaces and legislation to provide payments for ecosystem services (Bennett & Balvanera 2007; European Communities 2008; Turpie et al. 2008).”
The tradeoff and synergy between ecosystem services in the Grain-for-Green areas in Northern Shaanxi, China (2014, background): “The enhancement of the supply of ecosystem services (ESs) has led to declines in many other ESs (Rodríguez et al., 2006; Bennett and Balvanera, 2007), as evidences have emerged that intentional management options that are beneficial for one service may cause a cross-balance that reduce the benefits ”
Multi-functional landscapes in semi arid environments: implications for biodiversity and ecosystem services (2010, background): “…an ecological and socio-economic perspective, there is a need to promote practices based on sustainability, ecological resilience, connectivity and movement in the face of climate change, optimised biodiversity retention and protection of ecosystem service delivery (Bennett and Balvanera 2007).”
An ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development (2008, background): “We must simultaneously consider multiple ecosystem services and multiple production functions, not just to obtain a more complete understanding of the benefits and losses, but because any one ecosystem service might be related, either positively or negatively, to other services (26, 27).”
Towards an assessment of multiple ecosystem processes and services via functional traits (2010, background): “The assessment of multiple ecosystem services: identifying trait–service clusters Progress in the management of multiple ecosystem service provision can be attained by identifying clusters of ecologically-related services (Bennett and Balvanera 2007).”
Ecosystem services and economic development in Austrian agricultural landscapes - The impact of policy and climate change scenarios on trade-offs and synergies (2015, background): “…the increase in agricultural production has become a dominant driving force in diminishing the potential of ecosystems to provide ES related to regulation andmaintenance as well as cultural services (Tilman et al., 2002; Bennett and Balvanera, 2007; Power, 2010; Bryan, 2013; Schirpke et al., 2014).”
Pathways to achieve a set of ambitious global sustainability objectives by 2050: Explorations using the IMAGE integrated assessment model (2015, unknown): “In multifunctional landscapes, high yields may potentially still be achievedbycombiningtechnologicaladvanceswiththeservices provided by natural processes (Bennett and Balvanera, 2007).”
Embodied HANPP: Mapping the spatial disconnect between global biomass production and consumption (2009, background): “Globalization, along with current trends in urbanization, has fundamentally altered the spatial scales on which these interactions occur, affecting both the demand for and the supply of ecosystem services (Bennett and Balvanera, 2007).”
Ecosystem Services, Land-Cover Change, and Stakeholders: Finding a Sustainable Foothold for a Semiarid Biodiversity Hotspot (2009, background): “Decisions to exploit a particular ecosystem service affect the type, magnitude, and mix of services provided by that ecosystem (De Fries et al. 2004, Rodríguez et al. 2006, Bennett and Balvanera 2007).”
Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2009, background): “The general increase in provisioning services over the past century has been achieved at the expense of decreases in regulating and cultural services, and biodiversity (12, 40, 41).”
Biodiversity in forest carbon sequestration initiatives: not just a side benefit (2009, background): “For instance, there is often, albeit not automatically, a compromise between plant traits desirable for food and fodder production and those conducive to carbon sequestration [40 ,45 ].”
Interactions Among Ecosystem Services Across Land Uses in a Floodplain (2014, background): “…2008. ecosystem services (ES; Costanza et al. 1997, de Groot et al. 2002), i.e., the benefits humans obtain from ecosystems, such as clean air, water, food, raw materials, and recreation (Rose and Chapman 2003, Bennett and Balvanera 2007, Barral and Maceira 2012, Rathwell and Peterson 2012).”