Argumentation and Education

By N. M. Mirza, Anne-Nelly Perret-Clermont. 2009

107 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1d03f5ee2f1ea7ec8e744f497a455dd0c20a7315

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Neil Mercer

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Neil Mercer
2. Robyn M. Gillies

In Education

1. Neil Mercer

Citations in the corpus

• Argumentation, Dialogue Theory, and Probability Modeling: Alternative Frameworks for Argumentation Research in Education (2011, unknown): “…of books (Andriessen, Baker, & Suthers, 2003; Andriessen & Coirier, 1999; Erduran & Jimenez-Aleixandre, 2008; Kirschner, Buckingham Shum, & Carr, 2003; Muller Mirza & Perret-Clermont, 2009; Reed & Norman, 2004) and special editions of journals (Nussbaum, 2008a; Voss, 2001) dedicated to the topic.”
• The Social Brain, Language, and Goal-Directed Collective Thinking: A Social Conception of Cognition and Its Implications for Understanding How We Think, Teach, and Learn (2013, background): “This would encourage a “reflective stance” and develop a capacity for intramental “dialogue” (Muller-Mirza & Perret-Clermont, 2009).”