Agricultural research, livelihoods, and poverty: studies of economic and social impacts in six countries.
By M. Adato, Ruth S. Meinzen-Dick. 2007
111 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1cf1c08feb76ca1e5bcbe737e5abd6216751883c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- A. de Janvry
- E. Sadoulet
- Amber Peterman
- Nancy Johnson
- Andrew Dustan
- D. Rubin
- J. Njuki
- E. Waithanji
Citations in the corpus
- Gender, assets, and agricultural development programs: A conceptual framework: (2011, background): “While the SL framework does not, in itself, immediately generate testable hypotheses, it provides a starting point for more specific theoretical modeling in order to derive researchable questions and testable hypotheses (Adato and Meinzen-Dick 2007).”
- Promising approaches to address the needs of poor female farmers (2010, background): “In fact, qualitative data suggest that the women understood the technologies better than the men did (Place et al. 2007).”
- Recent Advances in Impact Analysis Methods for Ex-post Impact Assessments of Agricultural Technology: Options for the CGIAR (2010, background): “21 Good examples of this work can be found in Adato and Meinzen-Dick (2007). We should point out that by "qualitative analysis" we mean methods that are not data-driven in reaching their conclusions.”