Designing an indicator of environmental responsibility

By João F. D. Rodrigues, Tiago Domingos, S. Giljum, F. Schneider. 2006

144 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1cb4a84afa1c5dac4cd71ec95f807bde0c239dfa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Manfred Lenzen
2. T. Wiedmann
3. E. Dietzenbacher
4. G. P. Peters
5. Edgar G. Hertwich
6. J. Barrett
7. S. Giljum
8. Mònica Serrano

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. T. Wiedmann
2. E. Dietzenbacher
3. G. P. Peters
4. Manfred Lenzen
5. Edgar G. Hertwich
6. K. Wiebe
7. J. Barrett
8. João F. D. Rodrigues

Citations in the corpus

• Post-Kyoto greenhouse gas inventories: production versus consumption (2008, background): “Rodrigues et al. (2006) axiomatically derive an indicator that is additive, includes indirect effects, has economic casualty, is monotonic, and has symmetry in production and consumption.”
• Carbon and Materials Embodied in the International Trade of Emerging Economies (2012, background): “Suggestions include an equal splitting of shares between consumers and producers (Rodrigues and Domingos 2008; Rodrigues et al. 2006), or a calculation of shares based on the distribution of added value across countries and sectors (Andrew and Forgie 2008; Lenzen et al. 2007).”
• Responsibility and trade emission balances: An evaluation of approaches (2010, background): “On the one hand, the methodological debate about sharing responsibility that deals with the question of how to assign the environmental responsibility (Gallego and Lenzen, 2005; Rodrigues et al., 2006; Lenzen et al., 1 This is the terminology commonly used in the literature.”
• Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities — Part 2: Review of input–output models for the assessment of environmental impacts embodied in trade (2007, background): “Suggestions have been made to quantify ‘shared responsibility’, i.e. to allocate the environmental impact of producing (and consuming) a certain commodity to all agents of a supply chain (see e.g. Gallego and Lenzen, 2005; Rodrigues et al., 2006).”
• EDITORIAL: CARBON FOOTPRINT AND INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSIS – AN INTRODUCTION (2009, background): “Again, input–output analysis offers solutions for sharing responsibility between producers and consumers (see, for example, Andrew and Forgie, 2008; Peters, 2008a; Lenzen et al., 2007; Rodrigues et al., 2006; Rodrigues and Domingos, 2008; Serrano and Dietzenbacher, 2008).”
• Consumer and producer environmental responsibility: Comparing two approaches (2008, methodology): “The motivation for the remaining properties can be found in Rodrigues et al. (2006).”
• Income-based environmental responsibility (2012, background): “Income-based responsibility138 Some authors have analyzed another metric of environmental pressure,139 downstream responsibility (Rodrigues et al., 2006; Lenzen et al., 2007; Ro-140 drigues et al., 2010; Lenzen and Murray, 2010).”
• Multiple carbon accounting to support just and effective climate policies (2016, background): “It has been suggested that some of the four accounting systems described here be combined into a single indicator.(7,11,12,9) Some such proposals intend to thereby affect abatement burden-sharing, e.”
• A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights (2020, background): “…and income based accounts cannot simply be interpreted as ‘leakage’ or ‘outsourcing’ (Jakob and Marschinski 2013), as the attribution of responsibility along supply chains is complex (Rodrigues et al 2006, Rodrigues and Domingos 2008, Schaffartzik et al 2015, Steininger et al 2016).”