Multiple carbon accounting to support just and effective climate policies
By K. Steininger, Christian Lininger, Lukas H. Meyer, P. Muñoz, T. Schinko. 2016
201 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4fd6861c409aff87f840cf32bd88dfcfb24561e7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Environmental Engineering
In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Citations in the corpus
- Consumption-based emission accounting for Chinese cities (2016, result): “Recent studies have compared the two approaches and demonstrated the advantages of consumption-based accounting [16-19].”
- Consumption‐based carbon accounting: does it have a future? (2017, background): “Various analysts have posited that CB accounting has a great potential as a diagnostic tool that could enable national governments to acquire a better understanding of the impact of their consumption choices, and thus design policies and tools that can go some way toward mitigating the associated bu”
- The unequal distribution of household carbon footprints in Europe and its link to sustainability (2020, background): “The distributional perspective within countries and regions provides an additional monitoring base, and thus a more complete picture of the beneficiaries of various actions and policies (Cullenward et al., 2016; Roberts et al., 2020; Steininger et al., 2016).”
- Carbon emissions and their drivers for a typical urban economy from multiple perspectives: A case analysis for Beijing city (2018, background): “[8] argued that carbon emissions accounting under different multiple”
- Carbon emissions of cities from a consumption-based perspective (2019, background): “In general, the above studies of CBA based on the input-output analysis are relatively advantageous [21,27], as they not only contribute to a deep understanding of the influence on regional carbon emissions accounting by interregional trades but also provide an important theoretical basis to fairly ”
- A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part I: bibliometric and conceptual mapping (2020, background): “…(income-) and consumption-based accounting is highly valuable for informing environmental policies, evaluating responsibility for resource use and emissions (Jakob and Marschinski 2013, Schaffartzik et al 2015, Steininger et al 2015) and assessing the prospects for relative and absolute decoupling.”