The Institutional Environment for Multinational Investment

By W. Henisz. 2000

1,552 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1c734d0b064bfcdd9ff845e68d54fd770027f3c0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Economics and Econometrics

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Prior to reshoring: A duration analysis of foreign manufacturing ventures (2015, background): “Moreover, the knowledge and information exchange that develops in buyer–supplier interactions makes the customer vulnerable to suppliers' opportunistic behaviours (Ettlie and Sethuraman, 2002; Henisz, 2000).”
Institutions, Resources, and Entry Strategies in Emerging Economies (2020, positive): “In consequence, the relative costs associated with different entry modes are affected by the institutional framework ( Henisz, 2000; Meyer, 2001).”
Do multinationals really prefer to enter culturally distant countries through greenfields rather than through acquisitions? The role of parent experience and subsidiary autonomy (2007, background): “driven by formal and informal acquisition restrictions correlated with cultural distance rather than by firms’ strategic considerations (Henisz, 2000).”
International experience and FDI location choices of Chinese firms: The moderating effects of home country government support and host country institutions (2014, methodology): “, executive, legislative, and judicial) constrains any one institutional player from unilaterally affecting policy changes (Henisz, 2000).”
Trust, Investment, and Business Contracting (2015, background): “Firms rely on local partners that have a comparative advantage in dealing with local bureaucrats and the courts (Henisz (2000)).”
Political Economy of Foreign Direct Investment: Globalized Production in the Twenty-First Century (2016, background): “Henisz (2000, 2002) develops a measure of the concentration of political power that captures both institutionally defined separation of powers and the divergence of preferences among policy makers.”
Probing theoretically into Central and Eastern Europe: transactions, resources, and institutions (2005, background): “Formal rules establish the permissible range of entry strategies (e.g., with respect to equity ownership) and set the stage for possible bargaining between investors and authorities (Brouthers and Bamossy, 1997; Henisz, 2000; Ramamurti, 2001).”
Entry mode research: Past and future (2008, background): “Studies utilizing risk have investigated how risk will influence firm investment strategies (Brouthers, 1995; Delios & Henisz, 2000), and how perceived levels of risk will often predict levels of control by firms entering foreign markets (Ahmed, Mohamad, Tan, & Johnson, 2002; Anderson & Gatignon,…”
The Relevance of the Institutional Underpinnings of Porter's Five Forces Framework to Emerging Economies: An Epistemological Analysis (2005, background): “[1] The influence of transaction costs may be too significant to be ignored in emerging economies, a recognition that permeates the scholarship on emerging economies (e.g. Henisz, 2000).”
Japanese Firms' Investment Strategies in Emerging Economies (2000, positive): “This prediction, captured in our second hypothesis, has also been the subject of extensive empirical tests (Davidson & McFetridge, 1985; Gatignon & Anderson, 1988; Gomes-Casseres, 1989, 1990; Henisz, 2000a; Hennart, 1991; Kogut & Singh, 1988; Murtha, 1991; Oxley, 1997), the vast majority of which ha”