The Allocation of Publicly-Provided Goods to Rural Households in India: On Some Consequences of Caste, Religion and Democracy

By R. Betancourt, Suzanne Gleason. 2000

118 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1c6c9c266442aaae0b80831b59abfcfd95bc5787

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Stuti Khemani
2. S. Mukand
3. A. Mani
4. Philip E. Keefer
5. A. Banful
6. Georgios Efthyvoulou

In Sociology and Political Science

1. S. Mukand
2. A. Mani
3. Stuti Khemani
4. Philip E. Keefer

Citations in the corpus

• Democracy, Public Expenditures, and the Poor : Understanding Political Incentives for Providing Public Services (2003, unknown): “India, for example, instituted political reservations for scheduled castes and tribes in the national and state legislative assemblies.”
• Democratization, Decentralization and the Distribution of Local Public Goods in a Poor Rural Economy (2001, unknown): “Betancourt and Gleason (1999) use cross-sectional data at the district level to examine the effects of variation in voter turnout, the gender composition of voters, and the landless population share on levels of provision of doctors, nurses, and teachers.”
• Democracy, visibility and public good provision (2007, background): “5 This primarily empirical literature includes Betancourt and Gleason (2000), Foster and Rosenzweig (2001) among others.”
• Democracy, Public Expenditures, and the Poor: Understanding Political Incentives for Providing Public Services (2005, background): “India, for example, instituted political reservations for scheduled castes and tribes in national and state legislative assemblies.”