Ecological and taxonomic differences between native and introduced plants of southwestern Ontario

By Marc W. Cadotte, J. Lovett-Doust. 2001

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1c612c63f185a633af9f838e60e168ee13a0b5ca

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Correlates of naturalization and occupancy of introduced ornamentals in Germany. (2008, background): “, 1995; Williamson and Fitter, 1996) and long-lived species (Pyšek et al., 1995; Cadotte and Lovett-Doust, 2001) have been found to be more abundant compared with natives; a pattern that depends partly on the invaded habitat (Pyšek et al.”
Are urban systems beneficial, detrimental, or indifferent for biological invasion? (2017, background): “…or the ephemeral and stressful conditions that might be found in urban areas, simply because of the colonization pathways (e.g., from other urban centers or agricultural areas) and the likelihood of openings for them to successfully establish in the first place (Cadotte and Lovett-Doust 2001).”
Reproductive characteristics of neophytes in the Czech Republic: traits of invasive and non-invasive species. (2010, background): “Yet the emerging patterns related to propagule size seem to be rather robust; several comparative studies have confirmed that invasiveness is correlated with small seed/fruit size (Cadotte & Lovett-Doust 2001, Lake & Leishman 2004, Hamilton et al. 2005, but see Crawley et al. 1996).”
Phyloecology of urban alien floras (2009, methodology): “Using the general approach proposed by Cadotte & Lovett-Doust (2001), we found that alien species in the USA are significantly overrepresented by six families: Boraginaceae, Brassicaceae, Caryophyllaceae, Chenopodiaceae, Fabaceae and Solanaceae, while alien species in Central Europe are mainly…”
Life‐history correlates of plant invasiveness at regional and continental scales (2005, background): “The native-comparison approach compares the lifehistory traits of native with non-native species in the new environment (Crawley et al. 1996; Cadotte & Lovett-Doust 2001; Lake & Leishman 2004).”
Traits Associated with Invasiveness in Alien Plants: Where Do we Stand? (2008, background): “109 P. Pysšek and D.M. Richardson110 (cf. Thompson et al. 1995; Williamson and Fitter 1996), and Crawley et al. (1996) did so only without applying phylogenetic corrections, other studies clearly show that it is advantageous for an alien to flower for a more extended period, compared to a native (La”
Soil seed banks in plant invasions: promoting species invasiveness and long-term impact on plant community dynamics. (2012, result): “Some studies associating seed characteristics with invasion success found small seed to be an advantage (Cadotte & Lovett-Doust 2001, Hamilton et al. 2005), but overall the results were ambiguous (see Pyšek & Richardson 2007 for a review).”
Invasive plants and their ecological strategies: prediction and explanation of woody plant invasion in New England (2007, background): “…high relative growth rate (Grotkopp et al ., 1998; Pattison et al ., 1998; Grotkopp et al ., 2002), long flowering period (Goodwin et al ., 1999; Cadotte & Lovett-Doust, 2001; Py s ek et al ., 2003; Lloret et al ., 2005), vertebrate seed dispersal (Binggeli, 1996; Rejmánek & Richardson, 1996;…”
Ecological Patterns and Biological Invasions: Using Regional Species Inventories in Macroecology (2006, methodology): “To test this premise, traits of invasive species have been compared with those of native species in invaded habitats (Cadotte and Lovett-Doust 2001), and with those of non-invasive species from the species pool in the source region (Prinzing et al. 2002), as well as among non-native species of…”
Recruitment of three non-native invasive plants into a fragmented forest in southern Illinois (2004, background): “Stohlgren and Banowetz (1999) and Cadotte and Lovett-Doust (2001) also found that invasive plants are slightly more likely to be found in diverse communities (lower shape index), mainly because invasibility depends more on the presence of resources than on absence of competitors.”
Reproductive biology of Australian acacias: important mediator of invasiveness? (2011, background): “Various studies have shown early and extended flowering phenologies of invasive versus native plants to be correlated with invasive potential (Cadotte & Lovett-Doust, 2001; Pyšek & Richardson, 2007; Pyšek et al., 2009), thus conferring a fitness advantage by reduced competition for pollinators…”
Alien flora of Europe: species diversity, temporal trends, geographical patterns and research needs. (2008, background): “…first step in the search for the explanation of invasion patterns, and for characterizing invasive taxa and invaded ecosystems (e.g., Crawley et al. 1996, Cadotte & Lovett-Doust 2001, Kühn et al. 2003, 2004, Lloret et al. 2004, 2005, Hamilton et al. 2005; see Pyšek & Richardson 2007 for a review).”
Invasion success of exotic plants in natural ecosystems: the role of disturbance, plant attributes and freedom from herbivores (2004, result): “Similar results have been found for seed mass (Cadotte and Lovett-Doust, 2001; Rejmanek and Richardson, 1996) and flowering duration (Cadotte and Lovett-Doust, 2001; Reichard and Hamilton, 1997) in other studies.”
Predicting invasiveness of Australian acacias on the basis of their native climatic affinities, life history traits and human use (2011, background): “Successful invaders have been found to display earlier (Cadotte & Lovett-Doust, 2001; Belmonte & Vilà, 2004), later (Celesti-Grapow et al., 2003; Godoy et al., 2009a), longer (Lloret et al., 2005; Pyšek et al., 2009) or similar (Godoy et al., 2009b) flowering season compared to native species.”