Life‐history correlates of plant invasiveness at regional and continental scales
By Mark Hamilton, Brad R Murray, Marc W. Cadotte, G. Hose, A. Baker, Carla J. Harris, Damian Licari. 2005
384 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/24b7af87e8cb7da0f244faffb48afe23e0b2581a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Trait interactions help explain plant invasion success in the German flora (2008, background): “Hence, they focus on different stages of the invasion process and answer slightly different questions (see Hamilton et al . 2005; Py s ek & Richardson 2007 for details).”
- Pandora's Box Contained Bait : The Global Problem of Introduced Earthworms (2008, background): “Thus, researchers have identified traits correlated with invasion success (Hamilton et al. 2005, Kolar & Lodge 2001, Marchetti et al. 2004), tested hypotheses about the integration of introduced species into resident communities (Menke & Holway 2006), and characterized transient biological…”
- Plant invasion across space and time: factors affecting nonindigenous species success during four stages of invasion. (2007, background): “Timing of flowering, length of juvenile period, mode of dispersal, phenotypic plasticity, and seed size may also affect spread (Kolar & Lodge, 2001; Garcia-Ramos & Rodriguez, 2002; Hamilton et al., 2005; Lloret et al., 2005; Pysek & Hulme, 2005; Cadotte et al., 2006; Dietz & Edwards, 2006).”
- The more the better? The role of polyploidy in facilitating plant invasions. (2012, background): “…by multiple factors, and the role of species traits is context dependent and differs with respect to ecological settings and stage of an invasion (Hamilton et al., 2005; Williamson, 2006; Pyšek and Richardson, 2007; Van Kleunen et al., 2007; Wilson et al., 2007; Gravuer et al., 2008; Küster et…”
- The global invasion success of Central European plants is related to distribution characteristics in their native range and species traits (2009, methodology): “Only a few studies looking at traits associated with invasiveness have applied phylogenetic correction (Crawley et al., 1996; Prinzing et al., 2002; Ku¨hn et al., 2004a; Hamilton et al., 2005; van Kleunen & Determinants of invasion success of Central European plants”
- Potential distribution range of invasive plant species in Spain (2012, background): “Moreover, historical factors determining differences in propagule pressure such as the minimum residence time (i.e. time since first record) also influence the range size of invaders (Hamilton et al. 2005, Gassó et al. 2009, Ahern et al. 2010).”
- Species' intrinsic traits inform their range limitations and vulnerability under environmental change (2015, positive): “Traits that influence establishment and proliferation might be related to resource acquisition or competitiveness, such as specific leaf area (SLA) or plant height (Hamilton et al., 2005).”
- Ecological correlates of invasion by Arundo donax in three southern California riparian habitats (2008, background): “…species found small seed mass, short juvenile period, and high specific leaf area to be important in invasion (Rejmanek and Richardson 1996; Hamilton et al. 2005), while vegetative reproduction has been correlated with invasiveness for several rhizomatous species (Kolar and Lodge 2001;…”
- Traits Associated with Invasiveness in Alien Plants: Where Do we Stand? (2008, background): “…an approach can either identify traits that allow species to pass through early phases (i.e., transport and establishment) of the invasion process (Hamilton et al. 2005), or if factors associated with the chance of being transported are controlled for, provide relatively unbiased estimates of the…”
- Invasive species differ in key functional traits from native and non‐invasive alien plant species (2019, background): “…that have established in a particular area but have not be‐ come invasive) explores which traits predispose some alien species to become invasive (Hamilton et al., 2005), and is recommended as more effective than the invasive–native comparison for identifying traits associated with…”
- A Basis for Relative Growth Rate Differences Between Native and Invasive Forb Seedlings (2007, background): “In support, high SLA has been correlated to invasion success at both the community and the continental scale (Lake and Leishman 2004; Hamilton et al. 2005).”
- Early bird catches the worm: germination as a critical step in plant invasion (2016, background): “Invasive versus native species This type of comparison is useful to identify traits that can provide alien species with a competitive advantage over native species (Crawley 1997; Lake and Leishman 2004; Hamilton et al. 2005; Tecco et al. 2010).”
- MAcroecological Framework for Invasive Aliens (MAFIA): disentangling large-scale context dependence in biological invasions (2020, background): “Hamilton et al. (2005) analysed the role of several species traits in invasions at different spatial scales but, while they accounted for phylogenetic effects, they did not address different stages of the invasion process, and nor did they consider distributional characteristics in native ranges.”
- Life‐history traits are correlated with geographical distribution patterns of western European forest herb species (2007, background): “Journal compilation ª 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2000; Diniz-Filho & Torres, 2002; Hausdorf, 2003; Hamilton et al., 2005).”
- Superior performance and nutrient-use efficiency of invasive plants over non-invasive congeners in a resource-limited environment (2011, background): “2008), but this is by no means universal in congeneric comparisons (Kloeppel and Abrams 1995; McDowell 2002; Gerlach and Rice 2003), nor in analyses of regional floras (Hamilton et al. 2005; Leishman et al. 2007).”