Phyloecology of urban alien floras
By Carlo Ricotta, F. L. La Sorte, Petr Pyšek, G. Rapson, L. Celesti‐Grapow, K. Thompson. 2009
91 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eadb95ca698346510e236600526f56bcfd01bd48
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Milan Chytrý
- I. Kühn
- S. Klotz
- Jeannine Cavender-Bares
- Zdeňka Lososová
- Z. Otypková
- Jirí Danihelka
- Marc W. Cadotte
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Milan Chytrý
- I. Kühn
- L. Tichý
- S. Klotz
- Jeannine Cavender-Bares
- Marc W. Cadotte
- Zdeňka Lososová
- Sonja Knapp
Citations in the corpus
- Are urban systems beneficial, detrimental, or indifferent for biological invasion? (2017, background): “First, urban areas are defined by a unique combination of environmental conditions that do not exist in unmodified landscapes (Ricotta et al. 2009; Wilby and Perry 2006).”
- Native and alien floras in urban habitats: a comparison across 32 cities of central Europe (2012, background): “…floras across large areas based on standardized sampling protocols are rare (but see Celesti-Grapow & Blasi, 1998; Loram et al., 2008) and a few published meta-analyses used data from various sources which may not be directly comparable (Pyšek, 1998; La Sorte et al., 2008; Ricotta et al., 2009).”
- Phylogenetic and functional characteristics of household yard floras and their changes along an urbanization gradient (2012, background): “…the percentage of exotics in complete urban floras (including land areas beyond yards): Pyšek (1998a) showed an average of 40% of exotic plant species for 54 Central European cities; U.S. cities have percentages between 18% and 34% (calculated from species numbers given in Ricotta et al. 2009).”