Uses and gratifications of social networking sites for bridging and bonding social capital: A comparison of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat

By Joe Phua, Seunga Venus Jin, Jihoon Kim. Computers in Human Behavior, 2017

529 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1c0030fb68742078bfc0f3c700b603de45572df1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. Margaret Duffy
2. Iván Ventre
3. Diana Kolbe
4. Luis Vicente Casaló
5. Esther Thorson
6. Carlos Flavián

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Luis Vicente Casaló
2. Sergio Ibáñez-Sánchez
3. Carlos Flavián
4. Margaret Duffy
5. Iván Ventre
6. Diana Kolbe
7. Esther Thorson
8. Eunjin Anna Kim

Citations in the corpus

• Be creative, my friend! Engaging users on Instagram by promoting positive emotions (2020, result): “…(Järvinen, Ohtonen, & Karjaluoto, 2016; Sheldon & Bryant, 2016), comparing it to other social networking sites (Choi & Sung, 2018; Kim & Kim, 2019a; Phua et al., 2017a, 2017b), the impact of users’ personality traits (Kim & Kim, 2019b; Sheldon, Rauschnabel, Antony, & Car, 2017), the antecedents of…”
• The Impact of Perceived Usefulness of Online Reviews, Trust and Perceived Risk on Online Purchase Intention in Emerging Markets: A Mexican Perspective (2020, background): “With the rise of the online shopping and social media, consumers have started to share their opinions about products through online reviews (Phua, Jin, and Kim 2017).”
• Under the Influence: Social Media Influencers’ Impact on Response to Corporate Reputation Advertising (2021, background): “In particular, the use of SMIs has been increasingly popular among advertisers due to perceived authenticity as well as the SMIs’ abilities to directly connect with their audiences (De Veirman, Cauberghe, and Hudders 2017; Phua, Jin, and Kim 2017).”