Gradual Internationalization vs Born-Global/International new venture models
By Justin Paul, Alexander Rosado-Serrano. International Marketing Review, 2019
739 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Purpose During the last two decades, studies on the theoretical models in the area of international business (IB), such as gradual internationalization and the born-global firms, have gained the attention of researchers. The purpose of this paper is to critically review the studies on the process of internationalization (Gradual Internationalization vs Born-Global/International new venture models) to identify the research gaps in this area and to prepare a future research agenda. Design/methodology/approach Systematic literature review method was employed for this review. The authors highlight the findings from prior studies, compare and contrast salient characteristics and features, based on the articles published in journals with an impact factor score of at least 1.0, and provide directions for research. Findings The authors find that there are several areas that were under-explored in prior research. There is a great potential for theoretical extension and theory development in this field as it covers the tenets of four subjects: IB, marketing, strategic management and entrepreneurship. Originality/value There is no comprehensive/integrated review exploring the methods/variables and constructs used in prior studies integrating gradual internationalization/born-global models based on all the articles published in well-regarded academic journals. This review seeks to provide deeper insights, which help us to contribute toward the development of this research field.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1bf1b9470631d759d335363d537e6c52e0a813d5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Management of Technology and Innovation
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- Social entrepreneurship research: A review and future research agenda (2020, neutral): “…& Gupta, 2017), theory based review (Gilal et al., 2018; Paul and Rosado-Serrano, 2019), meta -analysis (Knoll & Matthes, 2017), bibliometric review (Albort-Morant and Ribeiro-Soriano, 2016; Randhawa et al., 2016), review aiming for model/framework development (Paul & Mas, 2019; Paul, 2019).”
- Frameworks for developing impactful systematic literature reviews and theory building: What, Why and How? (2023, positive): “Several authors (Billore & Anisimova, 2021; D’alessandro et al., 2022; Hassan et al., 2022; Roy Bhattacharjee et al., 2022) have published their systematic literature reviews using the TCCM framework of Paul and Rosado-Serrano (2019), which shows the wide acceptability of this framework.”
- Service innovation implementation: a systematic review and research agenda (2020, methodology): “This paper follows systematic search methods adopted from the extant literature (Bueno, Weber, Bomfim, & Kato, 2019; Canabal & White, 2008; Paul & Rosado-Serrano, 2019; Paul, Parthasarathy, & Gupta, 2017).”
- Financial literacy: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis (2020, neutral): “Tools such as publication trends and citation network analysis are applied in the present study (Paul & Benito, 2018; Paul & Rosado-Serrano, 2019).”