Assessment of Humanistic, Transpersonal, and Spiritual Constructs: State of the Science

By Douglas A. MacDonald, H. Friedman. 2002

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1b82bf143dfadb932efe36d0466f36a84b514b80

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Jack T. Huber
2. D. Rajendran
3. A. Bell
4. S. Theiler
5. J. Fisher
6. Douglas A. MacDonald

In Social Psychology

1. Jack T. Huber
2. D. Rajendran
3. A. Bell
4. S. Theiler
5. J. Fisher
6. Douglas A. MacDonald
7. Rafi M. M. I. Chowdhury
8. Mário Fernando

Citations in the corpus

• Development and Application of a Spiritual Well-Being Questionnaire Called SHALOM (2010, background): “Although there are commonalities between these two constructs, many authors agree they are not synonymous [6-8,13-18].”
• An Investigation of the Relations Between Altruism, Empathy, and Spirituality (2012, methodology): “…have been proposed, but there has been little systematic development of a cumulative body of empirical research because of lack of adherence to and utilization of a well-standardized, scientifically rigorous model by investigators (MacDonald & Friedman, 2002; MacDonald, Friedman, & Kuentzel, 1999).”
• Job stress, wellbeing, work-life balance and work-life conflict among Australian academics (2012, methodology): “The sole use of quantitative data collection methods and analysis could have limited the scope of the study; for example, qualitative methods could collect more rich sources of information (MacDonald & Friedman, 2002).”