The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility

By Elaine L. Ritch. 2011

521 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1ac9ffe9eb8bb659cdab1bd21ee3adf0185f98f6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Urban Studies

Citations in the corpus

Strategic corporate social responsibility and economic performance (2013, background): “The increased interest in ESG issues has stimulated a rapid development of empirical literature (Crane et al., 2008) focusing on the relationship between corporate social performance and financial performance (measured by either accounting or market-based variables).”
Corporate social responsibility and financial performance relationship: a review of measurement approaches (2017, background): “CSR has been studied for some time now, but a consensus is still missing concerning its definition and its constituent dimensions, constructs and principles (Crane et al., 2008).”
The government of self-regulation: on the comparative dynamics of corporate social responsibility (2011, background): “At a theoretical and analytical level, CSR is a more controversial concept (Crane, Matten, McWilliams, Moon & Siegel, 2008; Gond & Moon, 2011a) that has been subject to scrutiny and debates since the term emerged in the early 1950s (Bowen, 1953; Heald, 1970).”
Critical Essay: The reconciliation of fraternal twins: Integrating the psychological and sociological approaches to ‘micro’ corporate social responsibility (2019, background): “Several core debates have nurtured the development of the CSR field, particularly discussions of the financial impact of CSR practices (Crane et al., 2008; Orlitzky and Swanson, 2008), the identification and management of corporate stakeholders (Crane and Matten, 2007; Harrison et al., 2019), the…”
Strategic CSR: A Concept Building Meta‐Analysis (2019, background): “With a value of 0.90, kappa signified high inter-rater agreement (see Klier et al., 2017; Van Essen et al., 2015).”
Corporate social responsibility, real activities earnings management, and corporate governance: evidence from Korea (2016, background): “Overall, firms can focus on value creation by gaining reputation by matching stakeholder interests with CSR activities (Kurucz, Colbert, and Wheeler 2008, 90).”
The New Political Role of Business in a Globalized World – A Review of a New Perspective on CSR and its Implications for the Firm, Governance, and Democracy (2011, unknown): “During the past decades business firms have started to engage in activities that have traditionally been regarded as actual governmental activities (Margolis and Walsh 2003; Matten and Crane 2005; Scherer and Palazzo 2008a).”
Input and output legitimacy of multi-stakeholder initiatives (2012, background): “In a globalizing world with increasingly expanding economic activities and related social and environmental externalities, MSIs could be a way to deal with these externalities in a democratic way (Scherer & Palazzo, 2008).”
Sustainability Practices and Corporate Financial Performance: A Study Based on the Top Global Corporations (2011, unknown): “Kurucz et al. (2008) identify four categories of benefits that firms may attain from engaging in corporate social responsibility activities: (1) cost reduction; (2) competitive advantage; (3) developing reputation and legitimacy; and (4) seeking win–win outcomes.”
Global Governance: CSR and the Role of the UN Global Compact (2014, background): “…about the social and environmental responsibility for corporations, summarised under the umbrella term of CSR have generated considerable attention in public discussions, as well as in business reality and scholarly debates (Aguinis and Glavas 2012; Crane et al. 2008; Scherer and Palazzo 2011).”