The Australian Landcare movement: towards ‘post-productivist’ rural governance?

166 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Creating culturally sustainable agri-environmental schemes (2011, background): “Wilson (2004) concludes from reviewing this (and other) evidence that rather than changing environmental attitudes Landcare has been simply preaching to the converted.”
Multifunctionality of Agriculture:A Review of Definitions, Evidence and Instruments (2007, background): “Wilson (Wilson, 2004; Burton and Wilson, 2006) that there is a need to further theoretically underpin and decompose the concept.”
The potential for collaborative agri-environment schemes in England: Can a well-designed collaborative approach address farmers’ concerns with current schemes? (2012, background): “Whilst environmental collaborations involving farmers have been successfully developed, and analysed, overseas (notably the Australian Landcare Program (C.R.E.R. and C.J.C. Consulting, 2002; Curtis and De Lacy, 1998; Wilson, 2004), the German Landschaftspflegeverbände groups (Prager and Vanclay, 201”
Agricultural policy discourses in the European post-Fordist transition: neoliberalism, neomercantilism and multifunctionality (2005, background): “…the nature and extent to which industrialized country agriculture can be said to be passing through a 'postproductivist transition (see Hoggart and Paniagua, 2001; Wilson, 2001; 2004; Evans et al., 2002) highlights the need to further clarify theoretical understandings ofcontemporary rural change.”