Agricultural policy discourses in the European post-Fordist transition: neoliberalism, neomercantilism and multifunctionality
By C. Potter, Mark Tilzey. 2005
361 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f0091f9c39a508fd0083d2bbddbeee2165b0d7a7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
- R. Sonnino
- T. Marsden
- Evy Mettepenningen
- A. Verspecht
- H. Bjørkhaug
- Carol Richards
- G. Van Huylenbroeck
- L. Horlings
Citations in the corpus
- Multifunctionality of Agriculture:A Review of Definitions, Evidence and Instruments (2007, background): “Rather than a bimodal model (Thompson, 2004; Potter and Tilzey, 2005), we see scope for multifunctionality as a unifying concept under which the productive role of agriculture and its role in land management for biodiversity conservation, recreation, water management, climate control and so on can…”
- Transformational adaptation: agriculture and climate change (2012, background): “More recently, ‘productivist’agriculture hasbeen replaced in part by ‘multifunctional’ or ‘post-productivist’ agriculture in Britain and the European Union through alterations to the Common Agricultural Policy arising from changing societal values (Potter and Tilzey 2005; Wilson 2007, 2008).”
- Multifunctional agriculture in policy and practice? A comparative analysis of Norway and Australia (2008, background): “…in northern Europe, several scholars have shown that there might exist competing rural development dynamics (for example, Marsden, 2003; Holmes, 2006) or, more radically, that ‘the dominant framing is in favour of a neoliberal regime of market productivism’ (Potter and Tilzey, 2005, p. 581).”
- Rural development and the regional state: Denying multifunctional agriculture in the UK (2008, background): “In short, in the context of a policy approach that recognizes the need to diversify income sources and enterprises, but not necessarily to re-embed farming, agriculture is still caught very much in between the agri-industrial and the post-productivist models (see also Potter and Tilzey, 2005 ).”