Comparing Face-To-Face and Electronic Discussion in the Second Language Classroom

By Mark Warschauer. CALICO journal, 2013

654 citations recorded by the source corpus.

One of the supposed benefits of computer-mediated communication is that it can result in more equal participation among students. This study tested that claim by comparing equality of student participation in two modes: face-to-face discussion and electronic discussion. In a counter-balanced, repeated measures study, small groups of ESL students conducted discussion face-to-face and electronically. Amount of participation was calculated per person for each mode and was correlated to factors such as nationality, language ability, time in the U.S., and student attitude. In addition, a global measure of equality of participation was calculated and compared across the two modes. The findings showed a tendency toward more equal participation in computer mode and revealed some factors which correlated with increased student participation in that mode.

Subfields: Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory, Human-Computer Interaction

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1a85b013563ff4681c9939a4e5a730be32f8664d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Language and Linguistics

  1. K. Rajagopalan
  2. Aaron M. Fewkes
  3. P. Whitney
  4. M. Mccabe
  5. J. Scott Payne
  6. Eiko Ushida
  7. A. Georgakopoulou
  8. Alexandra Georgakopoulou-Nunes

In Literature and Literary Theory

  1. Aaron M. Fewkes
  2. P. Whitney
  3. M. Mccabe
  4. J. Scott Payne
  5. K. Rajagopalan
  6. Eiko Ushida
  7. A. Georgakopoulou
  8. Arnulf Deppermann

In Human-Computer Interaction

  1. Aaron M. Fewkes
  2. P. Whitney
  3. M. Mccabe
  4. J. Scott Payne
  5. K. Rajagopalan
  6. Eiko Ushida
  7. A. Georgakopoulou
  8. David G. Taylor

Citations in the corpus