Senior Citizens' Acceptance of Information Systems: A Study in the Context of e-Government Services

By Chee Wei David Phang, Juliana Sutanto, Atreyi Kankanhalli, Yan Li, Bernard C. Y. Tan, Hock Hai Teo. IEEE transactions on engineering management, 2006

342 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Information Systems and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1a7bdd791559338f22e94a9034c2ea706426f10f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

Citations in the corpus

Ambient Intelligence in Assisted Living: Enable Elderly People to Handle Future Interfaces (2007, background): “in Europe) are not used to modern IT systems and even worse, they are afraid of using them [7], [8].”
Determinants of intention to use the mobile banking apps: An extension of the classic TAM model (2017, neutral): “From our point of view, the experience in this type of tools improves the intention of use, being perceived by the user as a technology with a low risk exposure and without being determinant in its adoption (Phang et al., 2006).”
Comparison of the middle-aged and older users' adoption of mobile health services in China (2014, methodology): “[68] reported that self-actualization significantly influenced elderly people’s adoption behavior of e-government services.”
Antecedents of the adoption of the new mobile payment systems: The moderating effect of age (2014, background): “…as an influencing factor for consumer’s attitude and behavior, by analyzing aspects such as auto-scanning, automatic debiting and online services (Phang et al., 2006; Weijters, Rangarajan, Falk, & Schillewaert, 2007), the use of the internet (Niemelä-Nyrhinen, 2007), self-service technologies…”
How does social software change knowledge management? Toward a strategic research agenda (2012, background): “The traditional view does not account for the fact that people of different generations grow up with different technologies and content and react differently to them (Phang et al., 2006).”