From measuring impact to learning institutional lessons: an innovation systems perspective on improving the management of international agricultural research

By A. Hall, V. R. Sulaiman, N. Clark, B. Yoganand. 2003

358 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/19f13bdb2c40db3605e0bcf8261fae8328c6f249

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

1. L. Klerkx
2. C. Leeuwis
3. M. Schut
4. F. Hermans
5. N. Aarts
6. L. Bastiaans
7. J. Rodenburg
8. A. Ast

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Pieter J. Beers
2. C. Leeuwis
3. D. Spielman
4. M. Stuiver
5. Kasper Kok
6. M. Schut
7. F. Hermans
8. L. Klerkx

In Strategy and Management

1. C. Leeuwis
2. N. Aarts
3. L. Klerkx
4. F. Hermans
5. B. Campbell
6. Pieter J. Beers
7. D. Spielman
8. M. Stuiver

Citations in the corpus

• Socio-ecological niche: a conceptual framework for integration of legumes in smallholder farming systems (2006, result): “The approach we advocate is also in line with thinking associated with an ‘innovation systems framework’ (Hall et al., 2003).”
• Responding to global change: A theory of change approach to making agricultural research for development outcome-based (2017, background): “Several authors highlight the importance of building capacity for institutional learning (Hall et al., 2003; Horton and Mackay, 2003; Eade, 1997; Springer-Heinze et al., 2003).”
• Balancing multiple interests: embedding innovation intermediation in the agricultural knowledge infrastructure (2008, background): “The resultant requirement for them to become more client-oriented calls for institutional change towards a demand-driven mode of working (Byerlee et al., 2002; Levidow et al., 2002; Hall et al., 2003) forming effective linkages with industry and government (Etzkowitz and Leydesdorff, 2000) and socie”
• Systems approaches to innovation in crop protection. A systematic literature review (2014, background): “Innovation is considered as a process that is shaped by interactions between actors and institutions inside and outside the agricultural sector (Hall et al., 2003; Klerkx et al., 2010; Schut et al., 2013).”
• Innovation systems perspectives on developing-country agriculture: a critical review (2005, background): “) The innovation systems approach, in contrast, emphasizes the study of complex nonmarket characteristics (organizational characteristics and capabilities, for example) as well as nonmarket interactions (interactive learning processes and feedback loops, for instance) and how they are embedded in sy”
• Sustainable intensification of agricultural systems in the Central African Highlands: The need for institutional innovation (2016, background): “…whether farmers are resistant to change, or whether topdown policy and development approaches and methods do not capture sufficiently the needs and livelihood options as perceived by farmers (Van Asten et al., 2009), as well as by other public and private stakeholders (Hall et al., 2003).”
• Adaptive management in agricultural innovation systems: The interactions between innovation networks and their environment (2010, background): “…(AIS) thinking has become an increasingly applied framework to analyze technological, economical and institutional change in agriculture (e.g. Hall et al., 2003; Morriss et al., 2006; Spielman et al., 2008; Devaux et al., 2009; see also Spielman et al. (2009), for an overview of its…”
• Rural innovation systems and networks: findings from a study of Ethiopian smallholders (2011, background): “Later studies by Hall and Clark (1995), Hall et al. (1998), Johnson and Segura-Bonilla (2001), Clark (2002), Arocena and Sutz (2002), Hall et al. (2002, 2003) , and World Bank (2007) introduce the innovation systems approach to the study of developing-country agriculture.”
• The distribution of roles and functions for upscaling and outscaling innovations in agricultural innovation systems (2013, background): “The innovation systems perspective provides an analytical framework to study technological change in agriculture as a process of actions and interactions among a diverse set of actors engaged in generating, exchanging, and using knowledge (Hall et al., 2003; Spielman et al., 2008).”
• Can cultivars from participatory plant breeding improve seed provision to small-scale farmers? (2007, positive): “This approach recognizes (i) the importance of linkages between researchers and many other actors and agencies and (ii) the need for concerted action in addressing bottlenecks, if a technological change such as the adoption of new cultivars is to be successful (Hall et al. 2003).”