Markets, Deliberation and Environment

By J. O'Neill. 2006

148 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Toward a different debate in environmental accounting: The cases of carbon and cost–benefit (2009, background): “Environmental crises are rooted not in inadequate costing, insufficient commodification or incomplete accounting, 'but in the very spread of market mechanisms and norms' into putative non-market spheres of society or nature (O'Neill, 2007, p. 21).”
Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism (2010, background): “…ecosystem goods and services are valued (in the broader sense) differently by multiple stakeholders located in multiple geographies, from the local to the regional and global levels (Brown and Adger, 1994), and that these values may not necessary be captured by market prices alone (O'Neill, 2007).”
Transcendental values and the valuation and management of ecosystem services (2016, background): “These may equally shape peoples’ attitudes towards environmental projects and policies, and their behaviour in relation to these, and are likely to impact on how people perceive and frame ES valuation (O’Neill, 2007).”