Volumetric Dilution, Rather Than Sequestration Best Explains the Low Vitamin D Status of Obesity
By A. Drincic, L. Armas, Eileen E. Diest, R. Heaney. Obesity, 2012
622 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/18a4e3624a7231baa0cf1b7b33f47dda79a341e8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Pathology and Forensic Medicine
In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Citations in the corpus
- The nonskeletal effects of vitamin D: an Endocrine Society scientific statement. (2012, background): “In the WHI, an inverse association between baseline 25(OH)D levels and incident breast cancer disappeared after adjustment for BMI and physical activity levels (170).”
- Vitamin D—Effects on Skeletal and Extraskeletal Health and the Need for Supplementation (2013, background): “lipophilic vitamin D in the fat tissue [23,166,169,170], potentially explaining the described correlations [166].”
- Causal Relationship between Obesity and Vitamin D Status: Bi-Directional Mendelian Randomization Analysis of Multiple Cohorts (2013, background): “Dilution related to the greater volume of distribution has been recently proposed as the most likely explanation for the lower 25(OH)D concentrations in obese individuals [44].”