IMing, Text Messaging, and Adolescent Social Networks

By J. Bryant, Ashley Sanders-Jackson, Amber M. K. Smallwood. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun., 2006

330 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Education, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/186f3aba0ff8d9e5735adbab0f41ce2471c72d2d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Education

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

The Relationship of Loneliness and Social Anxiety with Children's and Adolescents' Online Communication (2010, positive): “Children and adolescents use this socially interactive technology to enhance communication mainly among family and friends who are also part of their daily offline lives, to make plans with one another, and to maintain social contact outside of their daily face-to-face conversations (Bryant et al., ”
Predicting adolescents' use of social networking sites from an extended theory of planned behaviour perspective (2010, background): “Alternatively, Bryant, Sanders-Jackson, and Smallwood (2006) reported that there is a co-construction between individuals’ face-to-face and online lives, with participants identifying that they use SNSs primarily for socialising with people from their face-to-face lives.”
Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use (2009, methodology): “This proposition seems valid in light of research by Bryant, Sanders-Jackson, and Smallwood (2006) which demonstrated that adolescents were quite willing to learn new communication technologies in order to maintain relationships with their peers outside of school.”
U txt WHEN? College students’ social contexts of text messaging (2012, background): “Others have concurred; Byrne and Findlay (2004) report that computer-mediated communication which includes texting and “is considered an effective tool for managing self-presentation in order to make the ‘right’ impression” (p.”
Online communication, social media and adolescent wellbeing: A systematic narrative review (2014, neutral): “Other researchers have avoided this dichotomy between the positives and negatives and have perceived the reality to lie “somewhere between these two extremes” (Bryant et al, 2006).”
Online Communication and Adolescent Well-Being: Testing the Stimulation Versus the Displacement Hypothesis (2007, background): “…on anonymous communication between unacquainted partners, 1172Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12 (2007) 1169–1182 ª 2007 International Communication Association IM mostly involves non-anonymous communication between acquainted partners (Bryant et al., 2006; Valkenburg & Peter, 2007).”
The Effects of Instant Messaging on the Quality of Adolescents’ Existing Friendships: A Longitudinal Study (2009, background): “Some others reported no significant effects (Bryant et al., 2006; Gross, 2004).”