Seeing power in action: The roles of deliberation, implementation, and action in inferences of power

By Joe C. Magee. 2009

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Safety Research, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1813b94217e4f4292099dc0707e502673c67b03a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Safety Research

1. Astrid C. Homan
2. Pamela K. Smith
3. Adam D. Galinsky
4. Gerben A. van Kleef
5. Carsten K. W. De Dreu

In Social Psychology

1. Gerben A. van Kleef
2. Adam D. Galinsky
3. Astrid C. Homan
4. Pamela K. Smith
5. Catrin Finkenauer
6. Eftychia Stamkou
7. Seval Gündemir
8. Carsten K. W. De Dreu

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Pamela K. Smith
2. Gerben A. van Kleef
3. Astrid C. Homan
4. Adam D. Galinsky
5. Eftychia Stamkou
6. Catrin Finkenauer
7. Seval Gündemir
8. Carsten K. W. De Dreu

Citations in the corpus

• The Nonconscious Nature of Power: Cues and Consequences (2010, background): “Additionally, observers witnessing such behavior may see and offer these individuals greater levels of power (Anderson & Kilduff, 2009; Magee, 2009).”
• Breaking the Rules to Rise to Power (2011, background): “For instance, individuals who display greater action orientation are perceived as more powerful because they signal that they have the capacity to act according to their own volition (Magee, 2009)—a freedom that comes with greater power (Galinsky et al., 2003; Keltner et al., 2003).”