The Assessment of Mindfulness with Self-Report Measures: Existing Scales and Open Issues

492 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Meditating for the Planet: Effects of a Mindfulness-Based Intervention on Sustainable Consumption Behaviors (2020, methodology): “Aspects related to mindfulness were assessed using the Comprehensive Inventory of Mindfulness Experiences (CHIME; Bergomi et al., 2013; Bergomi, Tschacher, & Kupper, 2014).”
Comparing Self-Compassion, Mindfulness, and Psychological Inflexibility as Predictors of Psychological Health (2014, background): “Conceptions of mindfulness vary broadly, as reflected by differences in how this construct is assessed (Bergomi et al. 2012; Grossman 2008).”
Mind The Hype: A Critical Evaluation and Prescriptive Agenda for Research on Mindfulness and Meditation (2017, unknown): “…one should be aware of the nuances of the various measures, how they relate to each other and/or conceptualizations of mindfulness (see Table 1; Bergomi, Tschacher, & Kupper, 2013; Sauer et al., 2013), as well as how different individuals might interpret the items on these measures (cf.…”
Examining workplace mindfulness and its relations to job performance and turnover intention (2014, background): “Coinciding with the growth of scholarly interest in mindfulness, researchers have developed a number of self-report measures designed to assess individual differences in mindfulness (for reviews, see Baer, 2011; Bergomi et al., 2012).”