The Adolescent Masculinity Ideology in Relationships Scale

191 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Determinants of Gender Essentialism in College Students (2008, background): “Evidence of connections between ideological beliefs, gender traits (i.e., “expressiveness” and “instrumentality”), and stereotypes (Sinn 1997 ;S miler2006a, b) has been found, as well as evidence for separateness ( Chu et al. 2005; McCreary et al. 1998).”
Measuring Gender: Options and Issues (2010, methodology): “The AMIRS was not associated with the BSRI, which suggests discriminate validity (Chu et al., 2005).”
The gender role strain paradigm and masculinity ideologies. (2016, unknown): “Chu, Porche, and Tolman (2005) developed the Adolescent Masculinity Ideology in Relationships Scale, a scale that assesses attitudes and beliefs about appropriate behavior for males within interpersonal relationships.”
Conforming to Masculine Norms: Evidence for Validity among Adult Men and Women (2006, unknown): “The latter claim has been interpreted as an argument for empirical distinctness (i.e., r∼0) between ideology and traits and has led some researchers to argue that non-significant relations are evidence of divergent validity for ideology measures ( Chu, Porche, & Tolman, 2005; Mahalik et al., 2005).”