Spurious Correlation: A Causal Interpretation*
By Herbert A. Simon. 1954
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- R. Breen
- J. Edwards
- Kristian Bernt Karlson
- Anders Holm
- John E. Mathieu
- Daniel M. Cable
- Richard P. DeShon
- Akanksha Atrey
Citations in the corpus
- Exploratory Not Explanatory: Counterfactual Analysis of Saliency Maps for Deep Reinforcement Learning (2019, background): “Spurious correlations, or misinterpretations of existing correlation, can occur between two processes (e.g. correlation between player-enemy distance and saliency), and human observers are susceptible to identifying spurious correlations (Simon, 1954).”
- Individual differences in need for cognition and decision-making competence among leaders (2011, unknown): “Traditional economic theories of behavior have assumed that people integrate all available information to rationally determine the utility of decision outcomes (Nash, 1950; Simon, 1954; Von Neumann & Morgenstern, 1944).”
- Towards Explainable Neural-Symbolic Visual Reasoning (2019, background): “Considering that additional variables and equations must be introduced in order to test whether a correlation between two variables is genuine or spurious [Simon, 1954], being selective is less straight-forward for connectionist models than for symbolic ones.”
- Bayesian Artificial Intelligence (2004, methodology): “There are equivalent alternative methods, such as one due to Simon and Blalock [257, 21] and ordinary least squares regression.”
- Complementary and supplementary fit: a theoretical and empirical integration. (2004, background): “From this perspective, the effects of psychological need fulfillment on attitudes are spurious and should become insignificant once value congruence is controlled (Simon, 1954).”
- Mediational Inferences in Organizational Research (2008, background): “Summing up these last two lessons from Hyman (1955), we see that the choice of which variables to include and how long and detailed a sequence of relationships to model are critical decision points for researchers.”
- An Extended Class of Instrumental Variables for the Estimation of Causal Effects (2011, unknown): “Simon, 1953, 1954; Strotz and Wold, 1960; Fisher 1966).”
- Causal inference (2011, methodology): “1For a related analysis under the rubric of “spurious correlation” see Simon [32].”
- The Book of Why (1983, background): “Conspicuously absent: any fruit containing vitamin C. (Source: Photograph by Herbert Ponting, courtesy of Canterbury Museum, New Zealand.)”
- Probabilistic arithmetic (1989, background): “1) and [757]) in order to study effects of product terms in path models.”
- Comparing Regression Coefficients Between Models using Logit and Probit: A New Method (2010, background): “Interest in such genuine or “true” coefficients has a long history in the social sciences and is usually associated with the elaboration procedure in crosstabulation suggested by Lazarsfeld (1955, 1958; Kendall and Lazarsfeld 1950; cf. Simon 1954 for partial product moment correlations).”