Exploratory Not Explanatory: Counterfactual Analysis of Saliency Maps for Deep Reinforcement Learning

By Akanksha Atrey, Kaleigh Clary, David D. Jensen. 2019

113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Saliency maps are frequently used to support explanations of the behavior of deep reinforcement learning (RL) agents. However, a review of how saliency maps are used in practice indicates that the derived explanations are often unfalsifiable and can be highly subjective. We introduce an empirical approach grounded in counterfactual reasoning to test the hypotheses generated from saliency maps and assess the degree to which they correspond to the semantics of RL environments. We use Atari games, a common benchmark for deep RL, to evaluate three types of saliency maps. Our results show the extent to which existing claims about Atari games can be evaluated and suggest that saliency maps are best viewed as an exploratory tool rather than an explanatory tool.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Reinforcement Learning, Safety, Robustness & Interpretability

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Dhruv Batra
  2. Mohit Bansal
  3. Trevor Darrell
  4. Abhinav Kumar Gupta
  5. Jitendra Malik
  6. Vladlen Koltun
  7. Sergey Levine
  8. Kristen Grauman

In Reinforcement Learning

  1. Dhruv Batra
  2. Devendra Singh Chaplot
  3. Jitendra Malik
  4. Manolis Savva
  5. Vladlen Koltun
  6. Sergey Levine
  7. F. Meier
  8. Aaron Gokaslan

In Safety, Robustness & Interpretability

  1. Lesia Semenova
  2. Zhi Chen
  3. Chudi Zhong
  4. Haiyang Huang
  5. Cynthia Rudin
  6. Jitendra Malik
  7. Vladlen Koltun
  8. Zsolt Kira

Citations in the corpus