Accounting technologies and sustainability assessment models
By J. Bebbington, Judy Brown, Bob Frame. 2007
366 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Building and Construction, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/176cc5c3f7f5185ae79ddb32769e73bfe5b4c076
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Building and Construction
- J. Kenter
- A. Morrison‐Saunders
- A. Bond
- Judy Brown
- Michael John Jones
- M. Reed
- Bob Frame
- Virginia H. Dale
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
- J. Kenter
- Jeffrey Unerman
- M. Reed
- A. Gasparatos
- A. Morrison‐Saunders
- Michael Christie
- A. Bond
- Joshua B. Fisher
Citations in the corpus
- What are shared and social values of ecosystems (2015, background): “While such approaches have considerable advantages, there remains debate about whether they should augment, complement, or replace cost–benefit as the principal tool for welfare assessment (O'Neill, 1996; Price, 2000; Holland, 2002b; Bebbington et al., 2007; Wegner and Pascual, 2011; Parks and Gowdy”
- Corporate social responsibility and sustainability reporting on the Internet (2009, neutral): “Some of these possibilities include risk reduction (Bebbington et al., 2007; Spence, 2009; Unerman, 2008; Welford and Frost, 2006), information cost (Cormier and Magnan, 2003), fear of losing competitive advantage by unnecessary disclosure (Daub, 2005), employee retention (Welford and Frost, 2006),…”
- Choosing the most appropriate sustainability assessment tool (2012, background): “a (TEEB, 2010) b (Zografos and Howarth, 2008) c (Hanley and Spash, 1993) d (Bebbington et al., 2007) e (Haberl et al.”
- Corporate reporting and accounting for externalities (2018, background): “…example, Herbohn (2005) and Lamberton (2000) both concluded their projects before monetisation, while Gasparatos et al. (2009), Frame and O’Connor (2011), Bebbington et al. (2007), Frame and Brown (2008) and Bebbington and Larrinaga (2014) discussed why caution should be exercised in monetisation.”
- Achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: An enabling role for accounting research (2017, background): “…Chapman, 2014); • linking accounting techniques that have (and may be) used in support of sustainable development ambitions (see e.g. Atkinson, 2000; Bebbington et al., 2007; Buhr and Reiter, 2006; Crutzen et al., 2017; Figge and Hahn, 2004; Frame and Cavanagh, 2009; Hopwood et al., 2010;…”
- Developing post-normal technologies for sustainability (2008, background): “Accounting, according to, inter alia, Bebbington et al. (2007), and Boyce (2000), could have a major role in enhancing and developing accountability in a participatory democracy through promoting open and transparent decision-making by making visible costs and benefits at various levels, and exposin”
- The argument against a reductionist approach for measuring sustainable development performance and the need for methodological pluralism (2009, background): “Furthermore, according to Bebbington, Brown, and Frame (2006) monetisation of certain environmental and social sustainability issues (e.g. biodiversity, human health, etc.) can be seen as morally questionable since it might be argued that it devalues these issues by bringing them to a position…”
- Sustainability assessment: the state of the art (2012, background): “It has been noted in the literature that there are many tools and techniques that can support sustainability assessment processes, particularly in terms of integrating considerations reflecting the three pillars of sustainable development (Bebbington et al. 2007).”
- An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies (2009, background): “As per Bebbington et al. (2007), “There is a widely recognized need for individuals, organizations and societies to find models, metrics and tools for articulating the extent to which, and the ways in which, current activities are unsustainable”.”
- Accounting for the environment: Towards a theoretical perspective for environmental accounting and reporting (2010, background): “5 As evidenced in the work of Jones and Matthews (2000), Jones (2003), Bebbington et al. (2001), Chambers and Lewis (2001), Baxter et al. (2003), Bebbington et al. (2007), and Howes (2003).”