Sustainability assessment: the state of the art

422 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Choosing the most appropriate sustainability assessment tool (2012, background): “Our reading of the literature suggests that five desirable features are largely shared across academics and practitioners involved in sustainability assessments (e.g. Binder et al., 2010; Bond et al., 2012; George and Kirkpatrick, 2007; Gibson et al., 2005; OECD, 2008) and include the ability to cap”
Analysis of the potentials of multi criteria decision analysis methods to conduct sustainability assessment (2014, background): “sustainability, by considering different sustainability spheres, perspectives, stakeholders, values, uncertainties and intra and inter-generational considerations (O'Neill et al., 1999; Munda 2005; Gasparatos et al., 2008; Bond et al., 2012; Gasparatos and Scolobig, 2012).”
Sustainable Project Management: A Conceptualization-Oriented Review and a Framework Proposal for Future Studies (2019, background): “In addition, from a practical perspective, there is still the tendency to favor the traditional management of stakeholders, instead of their engagement from the sustainability point of view [59].”