Biological basis for variation in residual feed intake in beef cattle. 2. Synthesis of results following divergent selection

By E. Richardson, R. Herd. 2004

313 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Agronomy and Crop Science, Animal Science and Zoology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/16e97774ad033c671014c53e64ff7818a60f2cad

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Agronomy and Crop Science

1. V. Oddy
2. E. Richardson
3. B. McBride
4. R. Herd

In Animal Science and Zoology

1. D. Bureš
2. L. Bartoň

Citations in the corpus

• On the determination of residual feed intake and associations of infrared thermography with efficiency and ultrasound traits in beef bulls (2009, background): “However, there are studies that reported differences in lean tissue deposition (Richardson et al., 2001; Schenkel et al., 2003; Richardson and Herd, 2004) and fat tissue deposition (Richardson et al.”
• Growth performance, carcass traits and meat quality of bulls and heifers slaughtered at different ages (2018, background): “The differences in FCR between sex and age groups might be attributed to several biological mechanisms, e.g. different body composition, protein turnover or tissue metabolisms of animals (Richardson and Herd, 2004).”
• Biological basis for variation in residual feed intake in beef cattle 1: Review of potential mechanisms (2004, background): “A companion paper [Richardson and Herd (2004) Aust.”