The effect of organic farming on butterfly diversity depends on landscape context
By M. Rundlöf, Henrik G. Smith. 2006
276 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/16c43aacb8a6948766302fd4ba4b8f29a4634ab0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Global and Planetary Change
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Homogenization of lepidopteran communities in intensively cultivated agricultural landscapes (2010, background): “The importance of the quality of surrounding landscape structure has been well-documented in the case of biodiversity effects of organic farming (Bengtsson, Ahnström & Weibull 2005; Rundlöf & Smith 2006; Holzschuh et al. 2007).”
- Ecological impacts of early 21st century agricultural change in Europe--a review. (2009, background): “forage resource outside the cropped area (Bengtsson et al., 2005; Rundlof and Smith, 2006; Rundlöf et al., 2008; Piha et al., 2007).”
- Creating patches of native flowers facilitates crop pollination in large agricultural fields: mango as a case study (2012, background): “…where the only remaining flower visitors are able to nest within farmland, but not in richer landscapes (as in this study), where the diverse flower visitor community probably depends on various foraging, nesting and overwintering resources (see Rundlöf & Smith 2006; Holzschuh et al. 2007).”
- Toward more concern for specialisation and less for species diversity in conserving farmland biodiversity (2010, background): “Therefore, another aim of AES is to increase landscape heterogeneity, a common wisdom which has been supported by many studies (Benton et al., 2003; Roschewitz et al., 2005; Tscharntke et al., 2005; Rundlöf and Smith, 2006; Holzschuh et al., 2007).”
- Set-aside management: How do succession, sowing patterns and landscape context affect biodiversity? (2011, background): “…can be expected to be higher in regions where source populations survived in natural or semi-natural habitats, whereas Tscharntke et al. (2005), Rundlöf and Smith (2006), Concepción et al. (2008), Isaacs et al. (2009) and Batáry et al. (2010) found the highest effectiveness of conservation…”
- Interacting effects of farming practice and landscape context on bumble bees (2008, background): “Six organically managed farms (with at least 50% of their arable land under organic management) with cereal cultivation were selected from each of two contrasting landscape types; heterogeneous mixed farmland or intensively farmed homogeneous plain (see Rundlöf and Smith, 2006).”
- Aphids and their natural enemies are differently affected by habitat features at local and landscape scales (2012, background): “The study was carried out in the province of Skåne in southern Sweden, which is characterized by a mixture of intensively farmed homogeneous plains and heterogeneous mixed farmland (Rundlöf and Smith, 2006).”
- Weed-insect pollinator networks as bio-indicators of ecological sustainability in agriculture. A review (2016, background): “Overall, several rare weed-Lepidoptera visitors networks occur in arable lands (Jennersten 1988; Rundlöf and Smith 2006).”
- Does organic farming reduce environmental impacts?--a meta-analysis of European research. (2012, background): “Some studies showed that landscape had more significant impact on biodiversity than farming regime (Kragten and Snoo, 2007; Piha et al., 2007; Purtauf et al., 2005; Rundlöf et al., 2008; Rundlöf and Smith, 2006).”
- Wild bee pollinators provide the majority of crop visitation across land‐use gradients in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, USA (2007, background): “It may also explain the weak effect of organic farm management (Tscharntke et al. 2005; Rundlöf & Smith 2006).”