The governance of innovation in Europe : regional perspectives on global competitiveness

By Philip Cooke, P. Boekholt, Franz Tödtling. 2000

331 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/169009e023e2682107e125e4c4c2679ede8b291c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Metropolisation of the European Economic Territory as a Consequence of Increasing Specialisation of Urban Agglomerations in the Knowledge Economy (2007, background): “…# 2007 Taylor & Francis DOI: 10.1080=09654310601016424 in the field of innovation activity, research and technological development (cf. European Commission, 1999, 2004; Cooke et al., 2000; Grotz & Schätzl 2001) are increasingly being considered as a key factor of regional economic success.”
What is evolutionary about ‘regional systems of innovation’? Implications for regional policy (2009, background): “The European Commission funded REGIS project (Cooke et al. 2000) identified only four regions out of 11—Wales, Baden-Württemberg, Basque country and Styria—that could fit the characteristics of RSI.”
Science–industry interaction in the process of innovation: the importance of boundary-crossing between systems (2001, background): “More recently, there has been a growing interest in innovation systems at the regional level (Autio 1998; Braczyk et al. 1998; Cooke et al. 2000).”
An evolutionary integrated view of Regional Systems of Innovation: Concepts, measures and historical perspectives (2005, background): “…the specific institutions that deliberately promote innovation and knowledge, as well as the wider socio-economic system in which political and cultural influences and specific modes of governance determine innovation structures and performances (Lundvall, 1992; Cooke et al., 2000; Freeman, 2002).”
Knowledge Intensive Business Services and Urban Industrial Development (2007, background): “…the other hand, a number of innovation surveys show that consultancy services (delivered by KIBS firms) are regarded as a relatively unimportant source of information in firms’ innovation activity, of far less importance than clients, suppliers, trade fairs and trade journals [Cooke et al., 2000].”
Cities and Regions Competing in the Global Economy: Knowledge and Local Development Policies (2007, background): “If regional systems of innovation are a standard to be attained, it is perhaps in the soft `superstructural' dimensions that regions vary most (Cooke et al, 2000).”
Universities and regional advantage: Higher education and innovation policies in English regions (2004, background): “…2001a). regarding regional development as being dependent on innovation and institutional learning processes, as notably found in the literature on ‘regional innovation systems’ (e.g. Braczyk et al., 1998; Cooke et al., 2000), and the notion of ‘learning regions’ (Florida, 1995; Morgan, 1997).”
Innovation and Networking in Peripheral Areas—a Case Study of Emergence and Change in Rural Manufacturing (2007, background): “Relations along the value chain go beyond market relations and are of a network type (Cooke et al., 2000, p. 75).”
Do different types of innovation rely on specific kinds of knowledge interactions (2008, background): “As a consequence, the focus of research partially has shifted from national to regional systems of innovation (Cooke et al., 2000, 2004) and to local industry clusters (Baptista and Swann, 1998; Keeble and Wilkinson, 2000; Malmberg and Maskell, 2002).”
Situated regional university incubation: A multi-level stakeholder perspective (2016, background): “…et al., 2013) and in particular Smart Specialisation-based regional innovation (Garcilazo et al., 2010; Camagni and Capello, 2013; McCann and Ortega-Argiles, 2013), have signalled a move away from universalist best practice approaches to incubation (Cooke et al., 2000; Asheim and Coenen, 2005).”