A dual-system framework to understand preference construction processes in choice☆
By Ravi K. Dhar, Margarita Gorlin. 2013
168 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/167baafc0759d57d3616a1c3cf2ff666120acc7a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- Laura A. Creighton
- Scott McCabe
- Marco Bertini
- Anja Lambrecht
- Bertram Gawronski
- Aylin Aydinli
- Galen Bodenhausen
- Wilhelm Hofmann
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Laura A. Creighton
- Marco Bertini
- Denis J. Hilton
- Anja Lambrecht
- Bertram Gawronski
- Aylin Aydinli
- Galen Bodenhausen
- J. de Houwer
In General Decision Sciences
- Scott McCabe
- Marco Bertini
- Laura A. Creighton
- Chunxiao Li
- Denis J. Hilton
- Zengxiang Chen
- Anja Lambrecht
- Bertram Gawronski
Citations in the corpus
- Time for a Radical Reappraisal of Tourist Decision Making? Toward a New Conceptual Model (2016, background): “Preference construction could arise as a result of system 1 generating an intuitive response or system 2 activating deliberate processing or an interaction of both systems (Dhar and Gorlin 2013).”
- Socio-demographics, implicit attitudes, explicit attitudes, and sustainable consumption in supermarket shopping (2016, background): “Models of behaviour that account for both deliberate and automatic cognition are known as dual-system models (see Alós-Ferrer & Strack, 2014; Brocas & Carrillo, 2014; Dhar & Gorlin, 2013; Samson & Voyer, 2012).”
- Price Promotion for Emotional Impact (2014, background): “In fact, although several researchers have argued that justification is effortful and deliberate (Dhar and Gorlin 2013; Kivetz and Zheng 2006), others have made the opposite claim (Sela and Berger 2012) and therefore raise the possibility of an overlap also with respect to H1.”
- Dual Process Th eories (2013, methodology): “…System-1 processing is efficient and System-2 processing is inefficient without specifying how System-1 and System-2 processing translate environmental inputs into behavioral outputs (e.g., Dhar & Gorlin, 2013; Evans & Stanovich, 2013), the explanations provided by the theory would be circular.”