Should parental prohibition of adolescents' peer relationships be prohibited?

108 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Enhancing autonomy-supportive I–Thou dialogue in schools: conceptualization and socio-emotional effects of an intervention program (2012, background): “In line with this view, Soenens et al. (2009) reported that an autonomy-supportive style of setting limits in the domain of peer relationships was related negatively to antisocial behavior.”
Developing and Validating the Perceived Parental Media Mediation Scale: A Self‐Determination Perspective (2013, methodology): “SDT considers autonomy, the perceived experience of volition in one’s choices and behaviors, as a central condition necessary for human development (Soenens et al., 2009).”
Motivating voluntary compliance to behavioural restrictions: Self-determination theory–based checklist of principles for COVID-19 and other emergency communications (2021, background): “Similarly, parental prohibition to engage with certain peers was associated with the adolescents reporting affiliating more with these peers when prohibition was experienced as controlling but less with them when prohibition was experienced as autonomy-supportive (Soenens et al., 2009; Van Petegem e”
A theoretical upgrade of the concept of parental psychological control: Proposing new insights on the basis of self-determination theory (2010, unknown): “As an example, guilt-induction can be used as a means to prohibit children to afﬁliate with deviant friends (Soenens, Vansteenkiste, & Niemiec, 2009).”