Response surfaces for an F-test for cointegration
By P. Turner. 2006
119 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/15e6c5f105b8334a4577fdd5accf4c48f101701a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- The Dynamics of Electricity Consumption and Economic Growth:A Revisit Study of Their Causality in Pakistan (2012, methodology): “We use critical bounds generated by Turner [56] which are more suitable for small samples as compared to the Pesaran et al.”
- Environmental Kuznets Curve in an Open Economy: A Bounds Testing and Causality Analysis for Tunisia (2014, background): “Moreover, critical values developed by Johansen cointegration approach are not suitable (Turner, [60]).”
- Multivariate granger causality between CO2 emissions, energy intensity and economic growth in Portugal: evidence from cointegration and causality analysis (2015, unknown): “(2001) and Turner (2006).”
- Electricity consumption, income, foreign direct investment, and population in Malaysia: New evidence from multivariate framework analysis (2009, methodology): “are not suitable for our small sample size (36 observations) and hence we derive the appropriate critical values from the response surface procedure developed by Turner (2006)”
- Small sample evidence on the tourism-led growth hypothesis in Lebanon (2014, methodology): “{ } is the order of the diagnostic tests. aAdjusted critical value bounds for the small sample are derived from the response surface method suggested by Turner (2006).”
- Testing the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis in Portugal (2015, unknown): “198 from Turner (2006)”
- DOES DEFENCE SPENDING IMPEDE ECONOMIC GROWTH? COINTEGRATION AND CAUSALITY ANALYSIS FOR PAKISTAN (2013, unknown): “Note: ⁄⁄⁄denotes significance at the 10% level comparing with critical bounds generated by Turner (2006). b and c also indicate significant at 5% and 10% level of significance.”
- Electricity consumption and economic growth nexus in Portugal using cointegration and causality approaches (2011, methodology): “…to cointegration within the UECM framework (Pesaran et al., 2001).2 Although many studies stated that the bounds testing approach to cointegration is suitable for a small sample, the critical values provided by Pesaran et al. (2001) are for a relatively large sample (Narayan, 2005; Turner, 2006).”