Institutional Theory and Entrepreneurship: Where Are We Now and Where Do We Need to Move in the Future?
By Garry D. Bruton, D. Ahlstrom, Hanxu Li. 2010
1,628 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1593ece4471c4c3b14768f55b5e642754977728f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- David B. Audretsch
- David Urbano
- Mike Wright
- Mike W. Peng
- Maksim Belitski
- Franz Willi Kellermanns
- K. Meyer
- Dirk De Clercq
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- David Urbano
- David B. Audretsch
- Sebastian Aparicio
- Ute Stephan
- Maksim Belitski
- Erkko Autio
- Saurav Pathak
- Mike Wright
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Ute Stephan
- Franz Willi Kellermanns
- Saurav Pathak
- Etayankara Muralidharan
- Mike Wright
- K. Eddleston
- Mattias Nordqvist
- David B. Audretsch
Citations in the corpus
- The Impact of Carbon Emissions on Corporate Financial Performance: Evidence from the South African Firms (2018, background): “Moreover, goals and objectives can be taken from one scenario and used in other settings, while technologies can also be utilised multi-purposively, enhancing an overall concern for human involvement and decision-making [23–25], “Institutional theory is thus concerned with regulatory, social, and cu”
- Success Patterns of Exploratory and Exploitative Innovation (2013, background): “…of meta-analysis has one major advantage for our research: Institutional environments tend to be stable over time, making comparative static analyses in one country difficult and calling for international comparisons (Bruton et al., 2010; Oxley, 1999). hence, a cross-country perspective is needed.”
- Formal Institutions and Opportunity Entrepreneurship. The Contingent Role of Informal Institutions (2019, background): “This has the advantage of providing us with a wide variety of cultural contexts, which is the exception in studies that relate entrepreneurship and institutional theory (Bruton et al., 2010).”
- Entrepreneurship and poverty reduction: A case study of Yiwu, China (2014, methodology): “This will shed further light on what firms and other large organizations can do in terms of significant societal problems (Ahlstrom, 2010; Yunus, 2007).”
- Institutional factors, opportunity entrepreneurship and economic growth: Panel data evidence (2016, background): “…and theoretical implications could be discussed regarding institutional economics as a framework for understanding the link between opportunity entrepreneurship and economic growth (Bruton et al., 2010), also considering the specific case of emerging economies such as Latin American countries.”
- Institutional determinants of university spin-off quantity and quality: a longitudinal, multilevel, cross-country study (2016, background): “Institutional theory is particularly helpful in understanding entrepreneurship in organizational contexts, which are largely determined by culture, tradition, history, legal environment, and economic incentives (Aldrich and Fiol 1994; Bruton et al. 2010).”
- Informal institutions and international entrepreneurship (2017, background): “Further, informal institutions are responsible for the differences in the value placed on entrepreneurs (Bruton et al., 2010), and more importantly they act as motivational stimulants to fuel their entrepreneurial intentions (Stephan et al.”