Economic Development and End-Use Energy Demand

By K. Medlock, R. Soligo. 2001

256 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/15493df9323a1442789a291629fb6ef0ce44c0d9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Citations in the corpus

Modeling international trends in energy efficiency (2012, background): “Parente and Prescott (2000) argue that the level of technology adopted in a country depends on policy barriers raised against the adoption of foreign technology.”
The causality between energy consumption and economic growth: A multi-sectoral analysis using non-stationary cointegrated panel data (2010, methodology): “If we consider energy consumption as a function of economic output, regulation and technical innovation, a suitable representation is the formalization provided in Medlock and Soligo (2001) as expressed in Eq.”
Long-Run Demand for Energy Services: Income and Price Elasticities over Two Hundred Years (2014, background): “Another area for future research, building on Nordhaus (1996) and Gordon and Griliches (1997), would be to estimate the impact of different attributes on consumption patterns, and to control for these changes to improve the elasticity estimates.”
Energy and Economic Growth: The Stylized Facts (2014, background): “Then energy use per capita is a concave or S shaped function of income per capita (Medlock and Soligo, 2001; Lescaroux, 2010).”
Measuring environmental policy stringency: Approaches, validity, and impact on environmental innovation and energy efficiency (2020, background): “Energy economists have shown a long-standing interest in the study of aggregate reduced form relationships between economic development and energy demand, both for positive and normative purposes (among many others: Zilberfarb and Adams, 1981; Galli, 1998; Judson et al., 1999; Medlock and Soligo, 20”
Gasoline Demand with Heterogeneity in Household Responses (2010, background): “Medlock and Soligo (2001) also find a similar relationship between income and overall energy use.”
Global Energy Use: Decoupling or Convergence? (2015, background): “Our results finding no apparent sign of decoupling between economic growth and the growth of per capita energy use are in contrast with the results of, among others, Jakob et al. (e.g. 2012), Lescaroux (2010), and Medlock and Soligo (2001), but in line with the findings of Csereklyei et al. (2016).”
Environmental performance, innovation and spillovers. Evidence from a regional NAMEA (2013, unknown): “To this purpose, adapting the modeling approach developed by Medlock and Soligo (2001) for the relationship between energy intensity and economic growth, emission level may be expressed as a non-constant income elasticity function in the form of:”
Eco-innovation, sustainable supply chains and environmental performance in European industries (2017, unknown): “By adopting the modelling approach developed by Medlock and Soligo (2001) for the relationship between energy intensity and economic performance as a theoretical starting point, emission intensity may be expressed as a non-constant income elasticity function in its multiplicative form.”