Scale-dependent habitat selection by mountain caribou, Columbia Mountains, British Columbia

By Clayton D. Apps, Bruce N. McLellan, T. Kinley, J. Flaa. 2001

180 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1529472da8cf51bad1092b2bbd5f570bfd3fb220

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Developing a population target for an overabundant ungulate for ecosystem restoration (2011, methodology): “We also validated the models with independent data by using locations from moose fitted with GPS and VHF collars from 2004–2010 in the study area during the late-winter season (12 January to 22 April; Apps et al. 2001).”
MULE DEER SEASONAL MOVEMENTS AND MULTISCALE RESOURCE SELECTION USING GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM RADIOTELEMETRY (2005, background): “…home ranges based on landscape-scale attributes and once localized into winter home ranges used habitat in a random or mixed fashion, thus illustrating the importance of scale considerations in ungulate resource selection analyses (Apps et al. 2001), which is rarely done (Mysterud and Østbye 1999).”
Study Designs and Tests for Comparing Resource Use and Availability II (2006, background): “Availability was also measured within a moving window around each animal location (e.g., Apps et al. 2001, Kunkel et al. 2004).”
Habitat Selection at Multiple Scales (2009, background): “Third, animals may select different habitat components at different scales (Bergin, 1992; VanderWerf, 1993; Apps et al., 2001; Johnson et al., 2002a; Mosnier et al., 2003; Anderson et al., 2005).”
Multiscale Habitat Use by Wolverines in British Columbia, Canada (2007, methodology): “We followed Apps et al. (2001) scale-dependent approach, except we evaluated 3 scales instead of 4.”
Fragmentation, dispersal and metapopulation function in remnant populations of endangered mountain caribou (2011, background): “Mountain caribou in the interior rain forests undergo well-defined migrations between ranges used for spring, summer/fall, early winter and late winter (Apps et al., 2001).”
Effects of scale on interpreting life‐history characteristics of ungulates and carnivores (2006, background): “Indeed, such studies of scale for large herbivores abound, including publications on caribou (Rettie & Messier, 2000; Schaefer et al., 2000; Apps et al., 2001; Johnson et al., 2001, 2002a, b, 2004), North American elk and red deer (Cervus elaphus; Mysterud et al., 2000; Boyce et al., 2003; Anderson…”
Population dynamics of the endangered mountain ecotype of woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) in British Columbia, Canada (2005, background): “Mountain caribou move from lower elevations in early winter to higher elevations in late winter (Seip 1992; Apps et al. 2001).”
SCALE-DEPENDENT SUMMER RESOURCE SELECTION BY REINTRODUCED ELK IN WISCONSIN, USA (2005, background): “…range and where to move within an established home range may be influenced by different environmental factors and scales, so animal–landscape relationships should be examined across a range of scales (Johnson 1980, Addicott et al. 1987, Mysterud et al. 1999, Apps et al. 2001, Johnson et al. 2001).”