Multiscale Habitat Use by Wolverines in British Columbia, Canada
By J. Krebs, E. Lofroth, Ian Parfitt. 2007
90 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/20511ee3b2816e7756ef7c7075058492d114f0c8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecological Modeling
- Kyle Knopff
- Colleen Cassady St. Clair
- Aliah Adams Knopff
- M. D. Schwartz
- M. Boyce
- E. Lofroth
- J. Krebs
- R. May
In Ecology
- Kyle Knopff
- M. D. Schwartz
- Colleen Cassady St. Clair
- Aliah Adams Knopff
- J. Persson
- Kevin S. McKelvey
- J. Mattisson
- Audrey J. Magoun
Citations in the corpus
- The bioclimatic envelope of the wolverine (Gulo gulo): do climatic constraints limit its geographic distribution? (2010, methodology): “As noted above, there is no question that the wolverine’s range has been affected by human persecution and that wolverine numbers can be reduced by trapping (Krebs et al. 2007; Lofroth and Krebs 2007; Squires et al. 2007), but the specific relationships explored in this paper are unlikely to have an”
- The wolverine's niche: linking reproductive chronology, caching, competition, and climate (2012, background): “Throughout its distribution, the wolverine displays extremely large home ranges, territoriality, low densities, and low reproductive rates (Copeland 1996; Inman et al. 2012; Krebs et al. 2007; Lofroth and Krebs 2007; Magoun 1985; Mattisson et al. 2011a; Persson et al. 2006, 2010).”
- Flexible habitat selection by cougars in response to anthropogenic development (2014, background): “Similar to other large carnivores that are considered sensitive to human disturbance such as grizzly bears or wolverines (Weaver et al., 1996; Krebs et al., 2007), cougars responded negatively to anthropogenic disturbance.”