SCALE-DEPENDENT SUMMER RESOURCE SELECTION BY REINTRODUCED ELK IN WISCONSIN, USA

By D. Anderson, Monica G. Turner, J. Forester, Jun Zhu, M. Boyce, H. Beyer, Laine R. Stowell. 2005

141 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ac618a4c7ad48104adc1d809a8530918e72a52be

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Ryan A. Long
2. J. Kie
3. R. Terry Bowyer
4. Mark Hebblewhite
5. C. Anderson
6. P. Lendrum
7. C. White
8. J. Whittington

Citations in the corpus

• Habitat Selection at Multiple Scales (2009, background): “One explanation for such scale-dependence is variation in the distribution and spatial structure of habitat components on the landscape (Boyce et al., 2003; Anderson et al., 2005; Mayor et al., 2007).”
• Human Activity Differentially Redistributes Large Mammals in the Canadian Rockies National Parks (2011, methodology): “For example, previous research that has used human activity models at broad spatial scales includes Theuerkauf et al. (2001), Anderson et al. (2005), and Shively et al. (2005).”
• Effects of scale on interpreting life‐history characteristics of ungulates and carnivores (2006, background): “…et al., 2001; Johnson et al., 2001, 2002a, b, 2004), North American elk and red deer (Cervus elaphus; Mysterud et al., 2000; Boyce et al., 2003; Anderson et al., 2005), muskoxen (Schaefer & Messier, 1995), Dall’s sheep (Rachlow & Bowyer, 1998), moose (Bowyer et al., 1999), and dorcas gazelles…”
• Habitat selection by mule deer during migration: effects of landscape structure and natural-gas development (2012, methodology): “Next, we sorted random locations from lowest to highest based on their predicted values and binned them into 10 groups of equal size (Boyce et al. 2003, Anderson et al. 2005, Long et al. 2009b).”