The Elasticity of Marginal Utility of Consumption: Estimates for 20 OECD Countries*
By David J. Evans. 2005
171 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Gender Studies, General Health Professions
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1528100c376d749f0c8cfbf343989f6a365f469d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Gender Studies
In General Health Professions
Citations in the corpus
- Guide to Cost-benefit Analysis of Investment Projects. Economic appraisal tool for Cohesion Policy 2014-2020 (2014, background): “363 See Evans, Kula and Sezer (2005) for further elaboration and the measurement of welfare weights in a regional context.”
- Critical issues for the calculation of the social cost of CO2: why the estimates from PAGE09 are higher than those from PAGE2002 (2013, methodology): “The EMUC values are based on HM Treasury 2003, which uses a value of 1.0, and Table 1 of Evans 2005.”
- The Social Cost of Co2 from the Page09 Model (2011, unknown): “The equity weight values are based on HM Treasury, 2003, which uses a value of 1.0, reduced from 1.5, and table 1 of Evans, 2005.”
- Discounting for Climate Change (2009, unknown): “See (Creedy and Guest 2008) and (Evans 2005) for a discussion of the difficulty of estimating ρ and η.”