The Social Cost of Co2 from the Page09 Model

By Chris Hope. 2011

113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ee44270cdaf015c6f898f1c4efd07456e86c35e8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. John P. Weyant
2. Chris Hope

In Environmental Engineering

1. John P. Weyant
2. Chris Hope

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

1. John P. Weyant
2. Chris Hope

Citations in the corpus

• Some Contributions of Integrated Assessment Models of Global Climate Change (2017, methodology): “Recent projections of the optimal cost of carbon from the three most widely used aggregate BC IAMs — Dynamic Integrated Climate-Economy (DICE; Nordhaus 2014), Framework for Uncertainty, Negotiation, and Distribution (FUND; Anthoff and Tol 2013), and Policy Analysis of the Greenhouse Effect (PAGE; Ho”
• Critical issues for the calculation of the social cost of CO2: why the estimates from PAGE09 are higher than those from PAGE2002 (2013, methodology): “The default PAGE09 model uses triangular distributions for these two parameters, as described in Hope 2011b; the PTP values cover the range from the Stern review assumptions at the low end to the empirical estimates in Nordhaus (2007) at the high Table 1 The social cost of CO2 from PAGE2002 and…”