Critical issues for the calculation of the social cost of CO2: why the estimates from PAGE09 are higher than those from PAGE2002
By Chris Hope. Climatic Change, 2013
116 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ee5abaeb5e645ee2c61b29572dfe8bd7d80bfb90
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Alexander Teytelboym
- Penny Mealy
- Jiacan Yuan
- R. Shwom
- J. D. Farmer
- Robert E Kopp
- Gernot Wagner
- Cameron Hepburn
In Environmental Engineering
- Jiacan Yuan
- R. Shwom
- J. D. Farmer
- Alexander Teytelboym
- Penny Mealy
- Robert E Kopp
- Gernot Wagner
- Cameron Hepburn
In Global and Planetary Change
- Jiacan Yuan
- R. Shwom
- J. D. Farmer
- Alexander Teytelboym
- Penny Mealy
- Robert E Kopp
- Gernot Wagner
- Cameron Hepburn
Citations in the corpus
- Tipping elements and climate–economic shocks: Pathways toward integrated assessment (2016, methodology): “For example, in Nordhaus and Boyer [2000]’s DICE-99 integrated assessment model (IAM), an estimated willingness to pay to avoid such catastrophes—1.0% of output-weighted global GDP at 2.5∘C and 6.9% of output-weighted global GDP at 6∘C—constituted about two-thirds of the total estimated economic dam”
- A Third Wave in the Economics of Climate Change (2015, methodology): “There are several POMs (e.g. PAGE2002/PAGE09) and extensions of POMs (e.g. Dietz and Stern (2015) for DICE) that attempt to deal with catastrophic outcomes explicitly.”